klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Depending on your definition of dying days, Storm's stuff was pretty good. Probably a 3 Count vs. Jung Dragons match as those guys always tore the house down.
KB Answers Wrestling Questions
- Thread starter klunderbunker
- Start date
Depending on your definition of dying days, Storm's stuff was pretty good. Probably a 3 Count vs. Jung Dragons match as those guys always tore the house down.
If Triple H doesn't tear his quad in 2001, the whole invasion angle is drastically changed, right? We wait another year and there would be the big WCW stars. How would that have changed things in your opinion, better Invasion angle, less McMahon possibly? Or was Shane being the "owner" a killer before it got set? Could Sting have come in then? (I remember watching a video from I think 2004 or sometime around there where Sting said no to the WWE because of how The Rock greeted Booker T with a "Who in the blue hell are you?")
Thoughts on Foley as the Commissioner in 2000.
Thoughts on Foley as the Commissioner in 2000.
Vincent Michaels
My weapon of choice? A green onion.
With 2010 nearing it's end, has this been a good year to WWE?
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Foley was great as Commissioner. he was the perfect choice as he was still relevant and everyone knew he could still fight if needed. He was still a big name and he didn't have to be in the ring and lose more of his health.
As for HHH, yeah I think so. It's pretty clear they were setting up HHH vs. Austin at probably Summerslam but that got all messed up. I've heard they were setting up HHH as the first Undisputed Champion but he wasn't back in time so they gave it to Jericho to keep warm. I'm not sure if that means they were always going to unify the titles then or not but it implies it at least. I think the Invasion would have started but they would have been able to hold off on it a bit longer.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Yeah it has. Compared to last year's awfulness, this was a good year I think.
The Holy One
What's really good?
I just looked at your review on this year's WM, do you still feel the same way about it?
PsychoBlack
Damn it feels good to be a Taylor!!
2010 match of the year so far
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
The Holy One
What's really good?
I thought it was great and one of the top 5 manias but after seeing some of the reviews online including CSR, many think it's in the middle of the pack.
Better entrance: Austin at WM 17 or HBK at WM 12?
LitasRevenge79
Mrs. John Constantine
KB...between the two companies, TNA and WWE, who do you think had the better year in terms of the Women's department and which one do you think is actually making better strides in terms of trying to better itself? Do you see any chance of either of them redeeming themselves to the point of the "attitude" era that everyone came to know and love of the Trish/Lita/Ivory/Molly Holly days at all even with the stricter television ratings going on now especially on WWE end?
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
I have an issue with people saying that a show has gotten worse merely months later. A show can age badly but not this far afterwards. It was a two match show and the matches worked. What more can you ask for?
As for who had the better year it's WWE by a mile. The Knockouts division has had a grand total of one, count it one (Angelina over Madison at the Whole F'N Show) clean one on one title change since January. The belt has changed hands by the champion not getting pinned, through people selecting a box and through people laying down. In WWE they've unified the belts, you have a dominant heel champion (tandem) in Laycool and there are new girls coming up in the division. It's bad, but it's bearable. The Knockouts are just atrocious at this point.
As for rising up to the attitude era again, no way. Trish and Lita were lightning in a bottle more or less with the ridiculous chemistry they had. Granted it helped that they had great sex appeal too with both being ridiculous ****s at times too. I can't picture it at all.
Not really. I'd put Cena over him actually.
I'd actually agree with KB and say Cena. Triple H put on shitty matches and essentially had his own show from what, middle of 2002 until the end of 2004? Sure from 2000 and 2001 (until the injury) Triple H was great, but Cena did more in his 8 years (since his debut). At least I'd say he has.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Given how absolutely awful 2003 was and how HHH was twice out for about eight months at a time and how horrid HHH was in 2002 and how his AWFUL Orton feud last year went, yeah I would. Tell me, what is the last above good HHH match you can think of?
Edge by far. Because everyone knew it was Y2J. That was everyone's problem with it and it's right.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Probably Punk's second. Didn't feel that important.
It led to his wonderful heel turn. I'd consider that a crucial role in his heel turn by cashing in on Hardy.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
And yet that had nothing to do with the cash in.
The Holy One
What's really good?
Favorite finisher?
I believe I said "It LED into his heel turn" see where I'm coming from?
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
And that had nothing to do with what you asked.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
DDT.
I know that, you said It didn't feel that important, I think it did. We agree to disagree?