klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Tease.
Oh.....maybe one or two.
HHH shouldn't have happened, the other three are fine.
KB Answers Wrestling Questions
- Thread starter klunderbunker
- Start date
Tease.
Oh.....maybe one or two.
HHH shouldn't have happened, the other three are fine.
Bernkastel
Reaper of Miracles
Canadian Triple Threat. Whom do you fancy as the "greatest."
Bret Hart vs Gene Kiniski vs Billy Watson.
Bret Hart vs Gene Kiniski vs Billy Watson.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Not Kiniski. I've seen some of his stuff and been bored out of my mind. And no not because he's old. Because he's boring and happens to be old.
Go with Bret.
Go with Bret.
Bernkastel
Reaper of Miracles
I respectfully disagree, but then again I wasn't asking for an objective opinion. So to each his own. And I am someone who has found the likes of Kane, Mark Henry, and Great Khali exciting to watch.
I'm being curious, we just had Sting debut on a Free PPV, and from all I have read, it generated a nice buzz all around even with casuals and with those who had turned their backs...
Now, obviously, we know Sting wasn't going to be on RAW, however, did WWE basically go 1 Step forward, 2 Steps backwards, by booking what they did on RAW, and not attempting to follow up a strong ending to Survivor Series with essentially an "exclamation point" show on RAW??
I'm not much of a fan of Satellite Reigns, but given they brought back injured Bryan for this show, couldn't they have brought back injured Reigns also, who obviously will be after Seth Rollins when he comes back, thus, they could have had Reigns come out to a now 'essentially' Authority-less Rollins and hype his return to destroy Seth, instead of "Live Satellite Interviews" with no real heat..
(^^^ Might not be the best idea, but it would really setup for Reigns returning to get his own back on Seth,lMO)
Now, obviously, we know Sting wasn't going to be on RAW, however, did WWE basically go 1 Step forward, 2 Steps backwards, by booking what they did on RAW, and not attempting to follow up a strong ending to Survivor Series with essentially an "exclamation point" show on RAW??
I'm not much of a fan of Satellite Reigns, but given they brought back injured Bryan for this show, couldn't they have brought back injured Reigns also, who obviously will be after Seth Rollins when he comes back, thus, they could have had Reigns come out to a now 'essentially' Authority-less Rollins and hype his return to destroy Seth, instead of "Live Satellite Interviews" with no real heat..
(^^^ Might not be the best idea, but it would really setup for Reigns returning to get his own back on Seth,lMO)
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
I don't think so, no. This time of year is always down so they're saving the big guns to make the major shows the biggest they can.
Fair enough.
It just seemed as though they blew up the balloon on Survivor Series, and stuck a pin in it the next night on RAW(because let's face it, RAW was essentially a nothing show this past week given there is a PPV in a couple weeks time).
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Raw was them taking a breather. There's nothing wrong with that.
Fair enough.
Any idea on how they will sell the TLC PPV within 2 weeks? Any early predictions on the possible Main Event of the show?
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Probably Ambrose vs. Wyatt.
They actually made me interested in that by having Ambrose vs Harper with Wyatt coming out to do a sneak attack and be brutal. Looking forward to round 2, no doubt.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Indeed. The ending should be huge.
Bockwinkel's Class
An Entity Of Existence
Have you seen the idiots posting "See? This is what happens when there's no AUTHORITY running things! The show is total crap and we need an evil dictator to set things right!"?
Vageena Hertz
New Member
Will the Royal Rumble be 40 men again in 2015?
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Have you seen the idiots posting "See? This is what happens when there's no AUTHORITY running things! The show is total crap and we need an evil dictator to set things right!"?
Indeed. They're my target practice.
I believe so.
You're given bullet points and the referees at ringside tell you when to get out. Low level people have a bit more freedom than bigger names, as no one is going to care what Heath Slater does as opposed to Randy Orton.
It was only going to delay the inevitable. WCW was going to screw up at some point and there was just no stopping Austin.
Bockwinkel's Class
An Entity Of Existence
Love it!
Btw, watched Starrcade '83 today and had your review of it up on my screen as well. You're dead on accurate about Dusty Rhodes. And he was an even worse booker than he was a wrestler. POS is the most polite thing I can say about the douchebag.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
He was past his best years by that point. Fans loved him but he didn't need to be there at that point. Save that stuff for TV.
Bockwinkel's Class
An Entity Of Existence
I was also pleased you liked Gordon Solie: I still consider him the best announcer ever.
Quick note on Johnny Weaver: Not a jobber (in fact he has the most total wins in the history of Mid-Atlantic by nearly 2:1 over Ric Flair), but he WAS mostly a tag-team guy.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Simply:
Ziggler "movement" vs Lesnar at Mania 31. Your thoughts?
()
Not happening.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Yeah but he wasn't much by that point.
Bockwinkel's Class
An Entity Of Existence
True, his heyday was in the '60s and '70s. Funny thing though, even in the early to mid '80s he was still winning more than he lost which can look odd to a more modern viewer. But Weaver was pretty much a "made man" with the Crocketts.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Sounds like Pedro Morales around that point in WWF.