KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 878 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

Here's something I got a chuckle over: Have you noticed that a lot of the IWC smarks are shitting on Reigns getting a big push bush but when you get into the the nitty-gritty of their thinking it comes down to them not liking him getting a push because he isn't Daniel Bryan?
 
Oh that's VERY common. Internet fans have their boys and there's no shaking them. Until they get the push and stay over of course.
 
I've really warmed up to the idea of Brock vs. Rock at Mania this year. If Brock is on pay roll until 32, why not Cash in on a huge payday with Rock/Brock this year?
 
This is the first year I've come in contact with the IWC so I'm getting some serious eye-openings lol

Somehow it used to be FAR worse.

What's TNA's situation in 2016?

Likely the same thing: clinging to life and trying to brag about their status.

I've really warmed up to the idea of Brock vs. Rock at Mania this year. If Brock is on pay roll until 32, why not Cash in on a huge payday with Rock/Brock this year?

I don't think insurance companies would let Rock do that and act at the same time.
 
Yeah but Hollywood has no interest in him wrestling. He got injured at Wrestlemania XXIX and missed some time. Imagine if he had broken his leg and a movie was put on hold because he wanted to wrestle. A movie company could put no wrestling in his contact or they might not insure him. No insurance, no movie.
 
Do we, as the IWC have legit concerns about Reigns being ready/over enough for the top spot at WM 31 if that is indeed how the WWE books him or are we overreacting since there is still a long 7 months before the show?
 
Overreacting. We're not the audience they need to impress. It's the audience that thinks no one can stop Lesnar and that Reigns is the last great hope.
 
Would you like to see 2 Diva matches on Raw? I don't mean squash matches but 6-7 minutes for each match

If Punk had rolled with the plan they had in place at WM what plans after WM do you think they had for him and would they have re-signed him?

I am not a huge Reigns fan much like I wasn't a huge Goldberg fan. I feel that WWE want to promote him based off of his family ties to the business. Keep in mind most talent that Vince had slotted to be the guy it didn't work out and someone else took the brass ring. If the plans stay on course and Reigns vs Lesnar for the title at WM would it be wise to have Heyman turn on Lesnar? It would be like evolution of Heyman's monster. Only until Reigns gets better on the mic.

How do you feel about Ambrose? I think he could be the next guy if officials take a long hard look at Dean. I think he has a similar look that Cena had. That blue collar mentality that resonates with the mass audience. I see Dean's character as being between Austin and Cena
 
If the point of Lesnar being there is to convince everyone he's the absolute best, doesn't he have to hold the title until Mania?

Will the smarks have the ability to hijack the steam Reigns will have heading into Mania? Because they will definitely try. If it isn't Daniel Bryan, they (the smarks) will find someone else... possibly Dean Ambrose?
 
No, but he probably should.

Oh sure. It's what they do, no matter who gets cheered. Bryan would have gotten the same treatment eventually.
 
Finished watching Ground Zero and I was blown away by Austin's promo on that show and the Raws that preceded it.

My question is how did WWE transition Ross to being Austin's biggest fan after watching the way Austin dogged him through all the promos and than stunner him at Ground Zero?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top