KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 798 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

I'd like your opinion on how the WWE seems to be using their superiority in terms of social activity as a substitute for displaying their actual tv ratings. I guess the question would be; is this a legitimate bragging right or a cheap attempt at hiding an inability to draw better ratings? I'm not all up in the latest trends, so I honestly don't know if being more socially active is better than having bigger ratings.

Also, what is your favorite Joshi match of the mid 80s?
 
I'd like your opinion on how the WWE seems to be using their superiority in terms of social activity as a substitute for displaying their actual tv ratings. I guess the question would be; is this a legitimate bragging right or a cheap attempt at hiding an inability to draw better ratings? I'm not all up in the latest trends, so I honestly don't know if being more socially active is better than having bigger ratings.

Also, what is your favorite Joshi match of the mid 80s?

I don't care about social media, especially given that they make up whatever milestones they achieve and act like they're big deals, even if no one cares.

Not a fan.

Do you think this holds the company back at all?

It's good for the company but less so for the fans.

Who owns the rights to AWA content? There's a ton of old AWA matches I'd love to see on the WWE Network.

WWE.
 
Why hasn't Kane had the success that Undertaker has in terms of having great matches? They've basically feuded with the same guys and Kane has worked, more or less, a safer style than Taker since he has never really been injured a lot. I just would have thought Kane would have more great matches under his resume. Of course, I could say the same about Big Show as well.
 
Why hasn't Kane had the success that Undertaker has in terms of having great matches? They've basically feuded with the same guys and Kane has worked, more or less, a safer style than Taker since he has never really been injured a lot. I just would have thought Kane would have more great matches under his resume. Of course, I could say the same about Big Show as well.

Undertaker is just flat out better. Kane doesn't really do anything exceptionally well. Undertaker is very good at multiple things, with #1 arguably being throwing people around. It sounds simple, but listen to a crowd when he just starts breaking stuff. It helps a lot.

Can you draw any parallels between Mankind heading into WrestleMania XV and Daniel Bryan heading into this years Mania?

Not really. Mankind had already had his big moment. Bryan's has only kind of come already.
 
Undertaker is just flat out better. Kane doesn't really do anything exceptionally well. Undertaker is very good at multiple things, with #1 arguably being throwing people around. It sounds simple, but listen to a crowd when he just starts breaking stuff. It helps a lot.

I get the last part. I've just viewed Kane as a stronger person than Taker and I wondered why he never got the same reaction but I get your point.

Do you feel that they are going to mention the fact that Taker has never beaten Lesnar one-on-one without referencing any specific match since those took place while he was the American Bad Ass?
 
During the New Generation most people point to WrestleMania X as the best show of that time period. Would you agree or is there another WWF event from that era that was better or if not better close?
 
Has Sam changed his name yet in regards to your guys' bet?

Do you see an Orton/Batista contract signing tomorrow with Punk appearing, beating them both up and signing his name making it a triple threat ala Mania 20?
 
During the New Generation most people point to WrestleMania X as the best show of that time period. Would you agree or is there another WWF event from that era that was better or if not better close?

It pretty much is by a few miles.

Has Sam changed his name yet in regards to your guys' bet?

Do you see an Orton/Batista contract signing tomorrow with Punk appearing, beating them both up and signing his name making it a triple threat ala Mania 20?

It wasn't a name change bet.

Perhaps. Someone is being added to that match for sure.
 
I recall Austin calling out Bret leading up to Bret's return in 96 but was Bret's return advertised, or did he just show up on Raw one night?

How much does Austin owe Bret for his rise to stardom? Would he have gotten as big without the Bret feud?
 
What do you attribute the fans admiration of Sid with? He jumped between WCW and WWF in the 90's spending substantial time as both face and heel but no matter what he was getting cheered.
 
Speaking of Sid, it seemed he was in WWE's future plans with how strong he was booked upon his return in 95 and especially with his strong run towards the end of 96 and beginning of 97 but he was gone just after Mania 13. What was the story there?
 
I'm curious where you stand on the whole Shawn losing his smile. Do you feel it was his way of not having to drop the title at Mania to either Bret or someone else, did it have nothing to do with backstage politics and he needed time off to either recharge mentally or physically or both, or is it some combination of the two or something else entirely?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top