klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
It's not a bad idea.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Is your website down? Not been able to access it at all today.
Kane and Undertaker are both veterans in the WWE, both of them are big men that are very athletic for their sizes, both had very similar movesets, they feuded together and were a major headline for WM, around 97-98 they were both essentially on the same level. I'd say that they each had their fan sets and many that were fans of one were fans of the other. Sure Kane hadn't had his character as long as Taker at the time but one could argue that they were both equally over and both drew a lot of fans and got major reactions. Both were in the title scene and feuded with Austin. The two were virtually interchangable barring Kane's limited speaking capability. So that being said, what do you think are the main reasons why Taker would get the bigger Angles, stay in the ME scene consistently whereas Kane would often bounce back and forth? Do you think Kane could have potentially been just as big as the Undertaker as far as legacy and being able to draw? If Kane beat his brother and went on to become undefeated, do you think the streak would be as relevant?
In order of favorite to least favorite, how would you rank the 3 faces of Foley?
What was your favorite Era in wrestling?
During the Monday night wars which show did you tune into more often?
Austin vs. Hogan.
You could pick either but both as faces would be awesome.
Generation vs. generation and philosophy vs. philosophy.