klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
FAR behind them. Not even remotely close.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
so is cena more on the rock's level?
What do you think is the REAL purpose of Nexus that hasn't been revealed yet?
No. Not even close. More like HHH's.
....there's a purpose? Why? Why can't people just like to be heels and try to get their leader the world title?
Other than the fact that they talked about, over and over, how they had a much higher purpose?
KB, did Orton and Batista really need Evolution?
And this has to be some big revealed secret? This is the issue I have with Russo's influence on the wrestling world: everything has to be this HUGE announcement and clearly specified thing that we eventually hear. It's pretty clear what Nexus is doing: they were fed up with how they were treated on NXT so they rebelled. Now it's them vs. the world (either Nexus or against us) and they've carved a place out for themselves and are now just a group of wrestlers that have banded together and are watching each others' backs. There's no end game to it. They're not trying to seize power or anything like that. They feel that they're better than everyone else and are here because they belong here, which is their purpose: to be there and to be the best.
KB, was there ANYTHING that could have saved WCW?
I have entertained this thought myself that this is the higher purpose that they were talking about all along. But I'm not going to completely discredit that they have a higher purpose that involves something more or deeper, possibly involving Triple H, The mystery GM, or even Michael Cole. It's great TV either way, but I'm not discrediting wither theory.
How about a few questions of my own. What are your feelings on Deception, Immortals and Fortune, and Hardy as a heel. How would you have booked it differently and how would you book it from here?
Also what are your thoughts on Styles a a heel at this point and where he goes from here. Also, thoughts on Joe?
And for WWE, thoughts on Husky Harris and Zack Ryder?
That's a VERY hard question to answer. Starting at what point, as the answers can change a lot based on when you want to start from.
Starrcade '97. When the first "bullet" was fired.
Oh sure they could have after that. A lot of stuff still could have been done. They were still in the lead for four months after that. It was the next two months of Hogan doing bullshit and crippling Sting then getting the title back in April when people got pissed off and said screw this let's watch Raw. Austin is new there. At that point WCW was on defense and they never got out of it because they couldn't get out of their own way.
After that it would have been REAL difficult to do. The company was in total freefall then and it was nothing but old guys winning the title. The problem was the same that WWF had back in 97: how do we get people to stop watching the other show? When Raw got stupid, WCW got worse. WCW started getting desperate and it just got worse and worse. This stat sums up WCW in 1999 as a whole: the whole year, two people in a PPV main event match were under 37 years old at the time: Goldberg (3 main events) and Benoit (1 main event). There were NO new faces at all other than Benoit who lost and Goldberg who main evented the first show of the year then didn't have a main event on PPV for 9 months.
Definitely.
Do you think more of the Cruiserweights deserved to be showcased?
They were showcased pretty well I thought. Moving them up to the US Title scene would have been nice though. WCW had a FAR too rigid emphasis on weight classes never facing each other for far too long. It was heavyweight and cruiserweight and that's it. Rey vs. Savage would have been interested for instance. My guess always was that the old guys were afraid they would be shown up which I think makes sense.
The old guys couldn't hang with the Cruiserweights. I've always thought that. The big thing I think about though is this: Wouldn't you rather see Rey vs Jericho or Eddie vs Malenko than Hogan vs Nash for a minute and a half? I know what I would rather watch.
The problem with that is you need to have them face the old established guys to give them some credability first. WCW never did that and it caught up with them.
Best year for Smackdown and best year for Raw since the brand split?
I think 2003 was a great year for Smackdown as you had Benoit, Angle, and Lesnar having great match after great match.
2007 was a decent year for Raw. Michaels and Cena had two great matches and Orton was pushed.
Exactly. Although, the fans LOVED Dean Malenko. (MALENKO, ALL CAPS... sorry bad Matt Hardy joke) He would have been just fine, and so would have some of the other guys. In all honesty though, I don't get why they were so scared of putting Cruiserweights over though.
I thought it was a circular argument: they didn't draw money because they weren't in the main event and they weren't in the main event because they didn't draw money. No one got a break ever no matter how hard they worked they weren't getting above the opening stuff because the big stars HAD to main event the shows. No one could get a push at all and the champions were SO protected it was absurd.
For instance there was a weird as hell angle at a show where Windham and Hennig were tag champions and were fighting Malenko and Benoit. The weird twist was that Malenko and Benoit had to beat them once and then beat them again to win the titles. Malenko gets Hennig to tap out and then immediately Windham blasts him with a belt and Hennig pins him to keep the titles. It was so stupid because a generic team like the cowboys (Hennig and Windham) got beaten CLEAN but get to keep the belts over young guys like Benoit and Malenko just because they were established names. Stuff like that is what killed WCW.