KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 1199 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

Oh I'd think so, but it would depend on how it was followed up on.

The novelty of seeing him win #17 in the most cheap fashion possible when everyone expects the whole confetti shower, emotional stuff etc. is what interests me most about it. Not sure how they'd do the actual reign and a Heel Cena tho.

The old dog who insists he's still the man to beat, even though he needs every cheap trick in the book to win sounds appealing. I bet Cena could pull off desperate pretty well.

It'd be a far cry from usual Cena. That's for sure. But I doubt they'd have him go out like that.
 
The old dog who insists he's still the man to beat, even though he needs every cheap trick in the book to win sounds appealing. I bet Cena could pull off desperate pretty well.

It'd be a far cry from usual Cena. That's for sure. But I doubt they'd have him go out like that.

Highly unlikely any of it happens, but as I said in another thread, "A man can dream, right"?
 
Can you explain the logic of Seth refusing Dean's fist bump? For a SHIELD mark like myself, it came off like Seth proved Ambrose's distrust of him correct there and thus, it made me go " F*** You, Seth!"
 
Give it time young one.

Oh, I know they'll be coming together probly by next week. I just dont see what leverage Seth had to do what he did. Speaking from the PoV of being heavily invested in SHIELD history, it kind of spoiled the great story they have told thus far rather unneccessarily, lMO.
 
It gives Dean a taste of his own medicine, which would put Seth, the intellectual one, back in the driver's seat, at least in his eyes.
 
It gives Dean a taste of his own medicine, which would put Seth, the intellectual one, back in the driver's seat, at least in his eyes.

:disappointed:

Hmm.. seems to be an unneccessary wrench in completing Seth's face turn in an acceptable manner(which has been my complaint about his entire face run thus far).
Dont get the logic in that unfortunately but thanks for trying to make sense of it. :thumbsup:
 
The Seth and Dean story might be the best story going on in all of WWE right now and is being told to near perfection. The gradual progression every week are fun to watch and the scene this week with Seth refusing the fist bump was too sweet, no pun intended. It might seem confusing, but looking at it from Seth's perspective it was totally justified. The fist bump, if it happens next week, might get the pop of the year, below the Hardys' return.

It's surprising that these Raw writes are capable of coming up with some decent week-to-week storytelling.
 
From what I've heard it's a variety of things, mainly being him running his mouth every five minutes and driving people crazy.
 
Kevin Owens saved Sami Zayn from Mahal and the Singh Brothers at a live event the other day (pretty sure it was the other day, that's when the video was posted). They still teased the hate each other thing but the crowd went off when they started double teaming and stuff.

Can you recall an enemy helping out another enemy like this at other house shows (I dunno maybe like Batista and HHH when it first started or something) or is this just a one off?

Would you like the see Zayn and Owens as that heel/face team eventually joining together and becoming best friends again (potentially Sheamus and Cesaro but something people want to see)?
 
Have you considered reviewing feuds in the same manner as you review PPV's/weeklies? Reviews on the Bret/Shawn WM build, or the Diesel/Mabel suckfest?

Obviously not the kind of thing you could do as the feud is still actually happening.
 
Was the loss tonight the point of no return for making Mahal look legit? Like we could talk for days about all the things they could have done differently, but, to me at least, the thing that stuck out the most about Mahal's run is he always needed his cronies to help him win. While tonight was arguably the best match between Orton and Mahal, Orton pinned him clean in a shade over ten minutes. Literally the first match Mahal has against Orton without the Singh brothers, he looses clean and decisively.

Sort of a random question, but why does it seem like Undertaker got a pass for his backstage politicking compared to others? Like the Kliq was bad, but Taker had his own crew of guys he would push for. A lot of us talk about the backstage respect that he did rightfully deserve, but there were fair number of times that he pushed his weight around just the same as a Shawn or a Flair, and most people demonize those two. Hell, its long been rumored that he was partially responsible for the burial of DDP post SummerSlam 2001.
 
It seems hypocritical to me, considering what JBL has gotten away with.

Yeah but JBL is big and from Texas so that's just him being himself.

Kevin Owens saved Sami Zayn from Mahal and the Singh Brothers at a live event the other day (pretty sure it was the other day, that's when the video was posted). They still teased the hate each other thing but the crowd went off when they started double teaming and stuff.

Can you recall an enemy helping out another enemy like this at other house shows (I dunno maybe like Batista and HHH when it first started or something) or is this just a one off?

Would you like the see Zayn and Owens as that heel/face team eventually joining together and becoming best friends again (potentially Sheamus and Cesaro but something people want to see)?

Just a one off. Keep in mind that show was in Montreal.

I could go for that actually.

Have you considered reviewing feuds in the same manner as you review PPV's/weeklies? Reviews on the Bret/Shawn WM build, or the Diesel/Mabel suckfest?

Obviously not the kind of thing you could do as the feud is still actually happening.

Probably not as you have to track down so many pieces and I rarely do anything other than full shows.

Was the loss tonight the point of no return for making Mahal look legit? Like we could talk for days about all the things they could have done differently, but, to me at least, the thing that stuck out the most about Mahal's run is he always needed his cronies to help him win. While tonight was arguably the best match between Orton and Mahal, Orton pinned him clean in a shade over ten minutes. Literally the first match Mahal has against Orton without the Singh brothers, he looses clean and decisively.

Pretty much, yeah, though I'd be shocked if he survives Summerslam with the title.

Sort of a random question, but why does it seem like Undertaker got a pass for his backstage politicking compared to others? Like the Kliq was bad, but Taker had his own crew of guys he would push for. A lot of us talk about the backstage respect that he did rightfully deserve, but there were fair number of times that he pushed his weight around just the same as a Shawn or a Flair, and most people demonize those two. Hell, its long been rumored that he was partially responsible for the burial of DDP post SummerSlam 2001.

It's a similar answer to Cena: when you've built up that much good over the years, you can get away with a lot.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top