KB Answers Wrestling Questions | Page 1061 | WrestleZone Forums

KB Answers Wrestling Questions

She renegotiated her UFC deal earlier this year, "I'm a UFC fighter. I just renegotiated. I have a lot of fights that I have in the UFC before I would be able to go do anything else," Rousey said.

I doubt Dana is gonna let her out of her deal so she can go sports entertain for Vince.

This is also before she got her face beat in for the first time.
 
Reading about Nick Bockwinkel's death reminded me of something. In the mid-90's wasn't he installed as the 'president' of either WCW or WWE (I'm pretty certain it was WCW).....the guy who was going to act as czar of the whole company and fill a continuing on-air role......but the project lasted about a week, after which I don't recall seeing him again.

I can't find anything on the Internet about this, but I'm sure it was Bockwinkel.

Sound familiar?
 
So yet again, last night, Reigns was part of a great match, this time against Cesaro. However, as usual, at the end of it, many 'smarks' use the usual, "he was carried and made to look good."

It is something that Cena has had to endure for so long and it seems that Reigns will be the same.
How long will it be before Reigns is acknowledged as being a great in-ring worker that he has become?
His in-ring work over the last year has been brilliant, lMO. And like Cena, he seems to deliver when it matters in terms of getting the audience to be interested in his matches, something only a handful on the Main Roster can do.
 
Seems like we're getting to the point now where people are starting to say Cesaro isn't and never will be, World Championship material. What do you think? If his popularity persists and continues increasing as it has the past few months, he's got to be considered, surely?
 
Would TNA have been in a better position if they'd gotten rid of Dixie Carter when Spike(?) said they'd renew the contract with them.
 
Do you think WWE (or at least the higher ups/the McMahon family) recognise that there is a much better storyline opportunity awaiting them if they do turn Reigns heel or do you think they just have it embedded in their mind s that Roman's the one to become the (baby)face of the company?

On a scale of 1-10 how surprised would you be if Owens actually ended up receiving the rocket push and won the title on Sunday, becoming the Authority's new 'man'.
 
On a scale from the Miz returning in 2014, to Triple H returning in 2002, what kind of reaction do you think Rollins will get when he comes back from injury?
 
I continue to fear that Vince and Co will be adamant that Reigns should be a babyface regardless of how great Corporate Reigns could be.

As a strong heel, we have as babyfaces:

Brock Lesnar
John Cena
Randy Orton
Dean Ambrose
possibly, Daniel Bryan
and Seth Rollins.

Surely, WWE wont pass all that up just because Reigns has gotten his reactions to arguably 60-40 since Mania...
 
On a scale from the Miz returning in 2014, to Triple H returning in 2002, what kind of reaction do you think Rollins will get when he comes back from injury?

Closer to Miz but it will be big.

I continue to fear that Vince and Co will be adamant that Reigns should be a babyface regardless of how great Corporate Reigns could be.

As a strong heel, we have as babyfaces:

Brock Lesnar
John Cena
Randy Orton
Dean Ambrose
possibly, Daniel Bryan
and Seth Rollins.

Surely, WWE wont pass all that up just because Reigns has gotten his reactions to arguably 60-40 since Mania...

You'd be surprised how stupid WWE would be if they had the chance.
 
Whats most likely on Sunday, Reigns/Ambrose or Reigns/ Owens? And who becomes corporate after match because that seems to be the story.

Or maybe Sheamus cashes in after?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top