Hi,
Since December of last year I've been saying that James Storm would be the most likely winner of The Bound for Glory Series of 2012 if they were to repeat what they did last year.
Altough it's not certain they will repeat the series this year, but hopefuly they do, James Storm should be the winner. And why? Well, if Bobby Roode reign as champion will continue for the next six months, which is also not certain, but not that far fetched, James Storm vs. Bobby Roode should be the end of a year long feud between these two guys.
Look, Roode beat Storm at Lockdown and why? Because there will be a rematch! It won't happen at Sacrifice, it won't happen at Slammiversary either, it should happen on the biggest stage that TNA has to offer and that's Bound for Glory. Now this is the problem: how can James Storm fight for the belt again if he lost the only shot he got? Well, the only way it seems plausible is for him to win the Bound for Glory Series like his buddy did last year.
Would it make sense? Of course it would. Storm vs. Roode was the main-event of the 3rd most important PPV of the year for TNA, and even the biggest on pay-per-view sales. So why couldn't they repeat it at Bound for Glory 2012? James Storm fighting the odds and winning the Bound for Glory Series would make a very good and compelling storyline that should be the way TNA should handle Roode and Storm.
Keep them apart until the beggining of The Bound for Glory Series, even make heels try to keep him away from the belt and trying to cost him matches, etc.
What do you think about my idea? Would you like it to happen? Do you see it as a possibility?
Since December of last year I've been saying that James Storm would be the most likely winner of The Bound for Glory Series of 2012 if they were to repeat what they did last year.
Altough it's not certain they will repeat the series this year, but hopefuly they do, James Storm should be the winner. And why? Well, if Bobby Roode reign as champion will continue for the next six months, which is also not certain, but not that far fetched, James Storm vs. Bobby Roode should be the end of a year long feud between these two guys.
Look, Roode beat Storm at Lockdown and why? Because there will be a rematch! It won't happen at Sacrifice, it won't happen at Slammiversary either, it should happen on the biggest stage that TNA has to offer and that's Bound for Glory. Now this is the problem: how can James Storm fight for the belt again if he lost the only shot he got? Well, the only way it seems plausible is for him to win the Bound for Glory Series like his buddy did last year.
Would it make sense? Of course it would. Storm vs. Roode was the main-event of the 3rd most important PPV of the year for TNA, and even the biggest on pay-per-view sales. So why couldn't they repeat it at Bound for Glory 2012? James Storm fighting the odds and winning the Bound for Glory Series would make a very good and compelling storyline that should be the way TNA should handle Roode and Storm.
Keep them apart until the beggining of The Bound for Glory Series, even make heels try to keep him away from the belt and trying to cost him matches, etc.
What do you think about my idea? Would you like it to happen? Do you see it as a possibility?