It's Damn Real!
The undisputed, undefeated TNA &
I'm sorry, but RVD is a fucking dull [face] champion.
Yup – I said it. Dull.
I know Rob Van Dam the wrestler packs more pop than C-4 (), and that there are few men in the industry who can put asses in the seats (or pull them out of them at the snap of a finger for that matter) like he can, and I am well aware that he's one of the most popular wrestlers on the planet, but I just can't help but feel that not only are his talents are being absolutely wasted because of the lack of a legitimate top-tier heel to bring out the best in him as a face in his current incarnation the way a more intelligent & cerebral heel would be able to do, but the very idea of him as the top babyface in the company is a failure in need of rectification.
Hear me out…
What is RVD most well-known for? Being "The Whole Fuckin' Show", right? Well, doesn't it seem most logical that anyone who considers themselves (albeit in character) as the entire show should most closely be characterized as sycophantic and narcissistic? I mean, since when are sycophants and/or narcissists acceptable qualities for a babyface in professional wrestling? Let's face it – it's not as though RVD is being booked as a tweener here. Were he, I might buy the argument that a degree of narcissism would be acceptable the way it was for more famous anti-hero types before him like Steve Austin and Scott Hall and more recently with Randy Orton and Edge. He's obviously being booked as the company's top babyface, so am I to really believe that the best possible option for a top babyface in the company is/was and more importantly continues to be RVD? I'm inclined to believe otherwise.
Prior to the concession of defeat and the return of iMPACT! to Thursday nights, believe me, I fully understood the rationale behind putting the strap on RVD over AJ Styles, as as great of a performer as Styles is, the iconic value of RVD was in fact more marketable at the time, but since the concession of defeat and the return of iMPACT! to Thursday nights, does that value retain it's continuity and sale? Personally, I don't really think so.
Let's face it – TNA is uncontested on Thursday nights, so it's not as though they need to be pulling out any more rabbits from the proverbial hat here. Solid booking and story lines would in fact sell the show IMO as a viable alternative were either to happen, so why is RVD truly the best option for TNA WHC still? While I appreciated (note the emphasis on past-tense) the efforts of management to capitalize on the notoriety of such a big name in the industry, the failure of the company as a whole was still prominent, and by no means IMO should the blame be absolved from RVD's feet any more than it is/was any number of the other top performers in the company. While poor booking and writing were undoubtedly the primary causes for the death of the Monday Night Wars II, IMO the idea that a number of characters were being booked as they were – including RVD as a top babyface and AJ Styles as the top heel were just too drastic and unbelievable to allow for the idea of either to really take root.
Call me crazy, but I was always led to believe that simplicity equates success, and simplistically speaking, heel champions bring the most out of the face performers in any wrestling company, which is exactly why heels tend to hold onto title belts for longer durations than faces. Factor in the fact that most of the company's top-tier talent are faces or face-tweeners right now (Anderson, Hardy, Pope, RVD, Abyss, Hernandez, etc.), and IMO the need for a heel champion really manifests as not just suggestion anymore, but more along the lines of necessity.
--
That said, it's Q&A Time!
• What do you think of the idea of RVD as a face, and do you think he's a better face or heel?
• Do you think RVD is the best option for TNA WHC right now?
• If not, who do you think the best option is, and are they face or heel, and why?
Yup – I said it. Dull.
2 lacking zest or vivacity : listless <a dull performance>
4 lacking in force, intensity, or sharpness <a dull ache>
5 lacking sharpness of edge or point <a dull knife>
6 lacking brilliance or luster <a dull finish>
I know Rob Van Dam the wrestler packs more pop than C-4 (), and that there are few men in the industry who can put asses in the seats (or pull them out of them at the snap of a finger for that matter) like he can, and I am well aware that he's one of the most popular wrestlers on the planet, but I just can't help but feel that not only are his talents are being absolutely wasted because of the lack of a legitimate top-tier heel to bring out the best in him as a face in his current incarnation the way a more intelligent & cerebral heel would be able to do, but the very idea of him as the top babyface in the company is a failure in need of rectification.
Hear me out…
What is RVD most well-known for? Being "The Whole Fuckin' Show", right? Well, doesn't it seem most logical that anyone who considers themselves (albeit in character) as the entire show should most closely be characterized as sycophantic and narcissistic? I mean, since when are sycophants and/or narcissists acceptable qualities for a babyface in professional wrestling? Let's face it – it's not as though RVD is being booked as a tweener here. Were he, I might buy the argument that a degree of narcissism would be acceptable the way it was for more famous anti-hero types before him like Steve Austin and Scott Hall and more recently with Randy Orton and Edge. He's obviously being booked as the company's top babyface, so am I to really believe that the best possible option for a top babyface in the company is/was and more importantly continues to be RVD? I'm inclined to believe otherwise.
Prior to the concession of defeat and the return of iMPACT! to Thursday nights, believe me, I fully understood the rationale behind putting the strap on RVD over AJ Styles, as as great of a performer as Styles is, the iconic value of RVD was in fact more marketable at the time, but since the concession of defeat and the return of iMPACT! to Thursday nights, does that value retain it's continuity and sale? Personally, I don't really think so.
Let's face it – TNA is uncontested on Thursday nights, so it's not as though they need to be pulling out any more rabbits from the proverbial hat here. Solid booking and story lines would in fact sell the show IMO as a viable alternative were either to happen, so why is RVD truly the best option for TNA WHC still? While I appreciated (note the emphasis on past-tense) the efforts of management to capitalize on the notoriety of such a big name in the industry, the failure of the company as a whole was still prominent, and by no means IMO should the blame be absolved from RVD's feet any more than it is/was any number of the other top performers in the company. While poor booking and writing were undoubtedly the primary causes for the death of the Monday Night Wars II, IMO the idea that a number of characters were being booked as they were – including RVD as a top babyface and AJ Styles as the top heel were just too drastic and unbelievable to allow for the idea of either to really take root.
Call me crazy, but I was always led to believe that simplicity equates success, and simplistically speaking, heel champions bring the most out of the face performers in any wrestling company, which is exactly why heels tend to hold onto title belts for longer durations than faces. Factor in the fact that most of the company's top-tier talent are faces or face-tweeners right now (Anderson, Hardy, Pope, RVD, Abyss, Hernandez, etc.), and IMO the need for a heel champion really manifests as not just suggestion anymore, but more along the lines of necessity.
--
That said, it's Q&A Time!
• What do you think of the idea of RVD as a face, and do you think he's a better face or heel?
• Do you think RVD is the best option for TNA WHC right now?
• If not, who do you think the best option is, and are they face or heel, and why?