The Samoan Heritage
Getting Noticed By Management
We see the same guys every single week. Now I can understand Why wwe would want to use their more over talents every week, but would it really hurt if one or two of them wasn't on a show for a week?
Majority of champions in wwe lack other contenders, outside of their current feud. Why is it so hard for wwe to say, "We build these guys, who aren't being used, so our champions can have other challengers?"
Raw:
-Titus- His post-Raw sports-like interviews were a great idea, and could have been shown on Raw to build up the "Titus brand," instead it was used as a joke. He could have been racking up wins to eventually feud with Reigns for the u.s championship.
-Summer Rae- While Sasha and Charlotte make history, she could be (winning &) talking about how she made "The BOSS," as well as gave Charlotte the confidence to become "The Queen." Eventually Summer would be ready to feud with Sasha once her feud with Charlotte conclude.
Smackdown:
-Crews- with a little tweaking, he could've easily been in Ellsworth position, and been built up as a contender against AJ. (probably not as over, but a better option long term.)
-Swagger- Former world champion, and could have been gaining momentum to be Miz's next challenger for the Ic championship.
-The Ascension- change ring gear/appearance and they could join Kane in his fight against the Wyatts.
Don't judge the ideas too harsh, the point I am trying to make is that wwe should be using all of their talent. The talent is there, why not use it? Wwe goes all in with guys like Reigns, Rollins, Balor, Owens, etc. Support these other guys and give them a chance to sink or swim as well.
I'm not upset that wwe doesn't use the rest of the talent, but I think it would help to give the audience something different each week. Its pretty much the same Y2KO/New Day/Enzo/CWC/Sasha&Charlotte/Ellsworth/Wyatts/Miz&Ziggler segments every single week.
What is your opinion on the situation?
Do you get bored of seeing the same people every week?
Is there a wrestler you would like to see get more camera time?
Who do you see wwe's non usage of them as a sign of things to come in terms of being "future endeavoured?"
Majority of champions in wwe lack other contenders, outside of their current feud. Why is it so hard for wwe to say, "We build these guys, who aren't being used, so our champions can have other challengers?"
Raw:
-Titus- His post-Raw sports-like interviews were a great idea, and could have been shown on Raw to build up the "Titus brand," instead it was used as a joke. He could have been racking up wins to eventually feud with Reigns for the u.s championship.
-Summer Rae- While Sasha and Charlotte make history, she could be (winning &) talking about how she made "The BOSS," as well as gave Charlotte the confidence to become "The Queen." Eventually Summer would be ready to feud with Sasha once her feud with Charlotte conclude.
Smackdown:
-Crews- with a little tweaking, he could've easily been in Ellsworth position, and been built up as a contender against AJ. (probably not as over, but a better option long term.)
-Swagger- Former world champion, and could have been gaining momentum to be Miz's next challenger for the Ic championship.
-The Ascension- change ring gear/appearance and they could join Kane in his fight against the Wyatts.
Don't judge the ideas too harsh, the point I am trying to make is that wwe should be using all of their talent. The talent is there, why not use it? Wwe goes all in with guys like Reigns, Rollins, Balor, Owens, etc. Support these other guys and give them a chance to sink or swim as well.
I'm not upset that wwe doesn't use the rest of the talent, but I think it would help to give the audience something different each week. Its pretty much the same Y2KO/New Day/Enzo/CWC/Sasha&Charlotte/Ellsworth/Wyatts/Miz&Ziggler segments every single week.
What is your opinion on the situation?
Do you get bored of seeing the same people every week?
Is there a wrestler you would like to see get more camera time?
Who do you see wwe's non usage of them as a sign of things to come in terms of being "future endeavoured?"