Batista is A grade main event superstar, forget all the BS from this fans. They seem to dislike him merely based off of the fact that HE won the Royal Rumble. Oh weh weh weh, get over it! Daniel Bryan is not a draw like Batista, Bryan was put in the main event back the fall and buy rates ALL SUCKED. When Daniel Bryan was closing Raw every Monday night, ratings SUCKED. There's a stroke of truth to all the butthurt Bryan fans out there who think he's god. Batista is better than Daniel Bryan and NO he is NOT overrated.
I'll agree with some of this. Batista is certainly a star in the WWE landscape. It's why during his four-year hiatus, fans kept trying to figure out who on the roster would replace the big man. It's why we looked first at Mason Ryan - and now at Roman Reigns - and said "There he is. That guy is going to be Batista." We've played similar games with HBK, Eddie Guerrero, Hogan, etc over the years, but we've never once played that games with Doink the Clown, Tatanka, Jim Duggan, Duke Droese,, etc. Why is that? It's because we only play that game with stars, and that we've played it with Batista should be an indication that the guy is just that.
Now, keep in mind that being a star doesn't make him Austin. It doesn't make him Cena, The Rock, Flair, Hogan, Warrior, Savage or even Mick Foley. That's where the overrated question comes from. Batista was definitely a star during his initial run in the company, and he's going to be a star again, but he was NEVER at the level of the aforementioned guys. People didn't buy tickets to see Batista. They don't buy pay-per views to see him or tune in to Raw to see what he's going to do. There are very few guys in WWE history that made us watch, and Batista wasn't one of them. Despite that, Batista is currently getting treated as if he was at that level - getting pushed straight to the WrestleMania 31 main event after just one appearance. Look, Batista was a star - but he's not that big a star. He's clearly overrated.
---------
Now you can bash Daniel Bryan in your posts despite the fact that the question doesn't pertain to him, but it doesn't change the fact that Batista not only didn't push the needle, but that he was apart of the main event scene during a four-year period when people started to seriously tune out the WWE. Ratings were still hitting 4's on a consistent basis when Batista won his first championship but were hovering in the low 3's by the time Batista quit in 2010. There is four years worth of evidence that says people don't want to see Batista.
...but hey, go on and use the small sample size for Daniel Bryan. Tell me how that 2.9 rating dipping to a 2.7 during a 5-week period is an indication that Bryan sucks. Just keep in mind that you look ridiculous when pointing to that number considering that the WWE went from a 4.3 at the start of Batista's run to a 3.2 rating at the time he left.