It has been said many times that the invasion angle of 2001 was handled poorly. This is mostly because of the absence of many big name stars. Would it have been better if the angle was held off for a year? Could it have been held off for a year?
If they waited until the summer of 2002 they would have had A LOT more big names involved in this angle. Just take a look at all these names that were around in 2002 that werent around in 2001. Bischoff, Hogan, Nash, Hall, Flair, Mysterio, and Steiner. Also Goldberg would have come in during the angle. Thats just the WCW side. WWE would have had Triple H and Chris Benoit back from injury. Shawn Michaels and Eddie Guerrero would have been back too. It would have been interesting to see who guys like Booker and DDP would align with after having spent a year with WWE. The two sides could have had a bidding war over new stars like Lesnar, Orton, Cena, and Batista. This doesnt have anything to do with time, but Big Show was horribly misused during this angle. He had almost equal experience with both companies during the Monday Night Wars and should have been used better. Maybe he could have joined the alliance due to his frustration of being misused in WWE. The only guy I would be concerned about postponing this is Stone Cold Steve Austin. We all know he took his ball and went home in 2002. Who knows if that would have happened with different booking? Would his health have held up to finish this angle if it took place a year later?
I think its obvious the angle would have been better if it was held off, but could it have been held off. Would it have had the same momentum if WCW was completely on the shelf for a year? I would say yes considering all the big names that would have been involved. Picture this main event for Invasion: Austin + Rock + Taker + HBK + Angle vs. Hogan + Hall + Nash + Flair + Big Show. We could have even had Vince McMahon vs. Eric Bischoff. Sounds a lot better than what we got.
So what do you think about the invasion angle taking place in 2002 instead of 2001?
If they waited until the summer of 2002 they would have had A LOT more big names involved in this angle. Just take a look at all these names that were around in 2002 that werent around in 2001. Bischoff, Hogan, Nash, Hall, Flair, Mysterio, and Steiner. Also Goldberg would have come in during the angle. Thats just the WCW side. WWE would have had Triple H and Chris Benoit back from injury. Shawn Michaels and Eddie Guerrero would have been back too. It would have been interesting to see who guys like Booker and DDP would align with after having spent a year with WWE. The two sides could have had a bidding war over new stars like Lesnar, Orton, Cena, and Batista. This doesnt have anything to do with time, but Big Show was horribly misused during this angle. He had almost equal experience with both companies during the Monday Night Wars and should have been used better. Maybe he could have joined the alliance due to his frustration of being misused in WWE. The only guy I would be concerned about postponing this is Stone Cold Steve Austin. We all know he took his ball and went home in 2002. Who knows if that would have happened with different booking? Would his health have held up to finish this angle if it took place a year later?
I think its obvious the angle would have been better if it was held off, but could it have been held off. Would it have had the same momentum if WCW was completely on the shelf for a year? I would say yes considering all the big names that would have been involved. Picture this main event for Invasion: Austin + Rock + Taker + HBK + Angle vs. Hogan + Hall + Nash + Flair + Big Show. We could have even had Vince McMahon vs. Eric Bischoff. Sounds a lot better than what we got.
So what do you think about the invasion angle taking place in 2002 instead of 2001?