In a chairs match.... | WrestleZone Forums

In a chairs match....

Pay Per Ghost

What they f*ck happened in the thread section here
....how do you win?

By smacking your enemy with a chair or is the chair placed on a pole and fastest one to retrieve it wins? Is only the chair a legal foreign object?

:confused:


I DEMAND SOME ANSWERS PEOPLE!
 
When I first heard of a Chairs Match I pictured them going at it like the chairs were swords or something.:lmao:
 
Going into last year's TLC I had the same question, but everybody I seemed to ask didn't have an answer. If it's the same as last year it's just chairs are legal. Pinfall and submission rules apply.
 
I would've thought it'd be more like Martha Stewart Prison Yard rules stip for a chairs match. The first one to decopage their chair is the winner. Martha Stewart comes out with a 40 and some Taco Bell and judges the best pimped chair, and the loser has to get their azz busted with the other jankety chair
 
The whole "Chairs match" stipulation is so PG. I want to watch a fucking match where they can legally it each other with a chair softly. Really WWE? Next they should make it a bat match! Have a WWE Superstar hit another Superstar with a "plastic" bat to the back just to make it hardcore!
 
I don't care much for the concept either (unless it was hanging from a pole) I just can't understand why you'd word it like that WWTNA... It's like if you they don't have unnecessary concussions and try at all costs to avoid them it's a bad thing. That is what I got from that statement, man.
 
The whole "Chairs match" stipulation is so PG. I want to watch a fucking match where they can legally it each other with a chair softly. Really WWE? Next they should make it a bat match! Have a WWE Superstar hit another Superstar with a "plastic" bat to the back just to make it hardcore!

Ye, chair shots in the back are for pansy. Long live concussions!
 
I don't care much for the concept either (unless it was hanging from a pole) I just can't understand why you'd word it like that WWTNA... It's like if you they don't have unnecessary concussions and try at all costs to avoid them it's a bad thing. That is what I got from that statement, man.

Never said that hitting someone in the head with a steel chair is okay. I just hate the concept of a chairs match where they limit things in this match like blood. It would not be exiting to see wrestlers hitting each other with a chair PG style. Can't really get on the concept too much since WWE knows how to work around a stipulation like this.
 
It's quite simple, both men wear giant chair suits and fight over a gold chair that is hung on a pole. First person to grab the golden chair gets crowned King of the Chairs and gets a golden chair crown.
 
The whole "Chairs match" stipulation is so PG. I want to watch a fucking match where they can legally it each other with a chair softly. Really WWE? Next they should make it a bat match! Have a WWE Superstar hit another Superstar with a "plastic" bat to the back just to make it hardcore!
Never said that hitting someone in the head with a steel chair is okay. I just hate the concept of a chairs match where they limit things in this match like blood. It would not be exiting to see wrestlers hitting each other with a chair PG style. Can't really get on the concept too much since WWE knows how to work around a stipulation like this.

Wow, you really are stupid. This is crazy.
 
I dont get it. Chair shots even to the skull very rarely cause hardway cuts. It's either due to carelessness (Hardy/Anderson) or excessive force (Taker/McMahon).

So in this era where workers are urged to be very careful, blood in a chairs match is very unlikely. We are more likely to see blood in the ladder match like last year.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top