IrishCanadian25
Going on 10 years with WrestleZone
Booker T. The Rock. Ron Simmons. Shelton Benjamin.
The history of African American Championships in Professional Wrestling - especially in the WWE - is about as long and distinguished as a Nixon expose on political ethics. With the NWA refusing to recognize the title reign of Bobo Brazil, many people look at Ron Simmons' short WCW Title reign in the early 90's as the first major world title reign a black professional wrestler has ever had. The Rock went on to add to it, though he's mixed race and identifies a lot with his Samoan heritage as much as with his African heritage. Booker T ALSO turned the trick in WCW, where Simmons had. Shelton never got higher than Intercontinental Gold.
Flash forward to 2008, and "coincidentally" after racially charged comments made by Michael Hayes to Mark Henry, the WWE is the embodiment of championship diversification.
Cryme Tyme rehired, in line for a major title push.
Kofi Kingston, a relative rookie, wins the IC Title.
Mark Henry, a perannial jobber to the stars, wins the ECW Title (maybe a year after Bobby Lashley held it).
Shelton Benjamin, usually a permanent resident of the WWE dog house, wins the US Title.
The trend is apparent. WWE has said that they are going after a flagging African American market, while others feel they are trying to make ammends for the comments by Hayes, especially after not firing the former Freebird.
Do you think the WWE is putting titles on African American wrestlers to make ammends for the comments by Hayes? Are they doing it to increase the market share with African Americans? Are they doing it in good faith? Or are they doing it because these guys are legitimate title holders?
Personally, this has shades of late WCW, where title reigns were commodities promised to wrestlers to sign contracts. If championships are being given to African American wrestlers simply because of their race, does that cheapen what should be an otherwise impressive accomplishment?
The history of African American Championships in Professional Wrestling - especially in the WWE - is about as long and distinguished as a Nixon expose on political ethics. With the NWA refusing to recognize the title reign of Bobo Brazil, many people look at Ron Simmons' short WCW Title reign in the early 90's as the first major world title reign a black professional wrestler has ever had. The Rock went on to add to it, though he's mixed race and identifies a lot with his Samoan heritage as much as with his African heritage. Booker T ALSO turned the trick in WCW, where Simmons had. Shelton never got higher than Intercontinental Gold.
Flash forward to 2008, and "coincidentally" after racially charged comments made by Michael Hayes to Mark Henry, the WWE is the embodiment of championship diversification.
Cryme Tyme rehired, in line for a major title push.
Kofi Kingston, a relative rookie, wins the IC Title.
Mark Henry, a perannial jobber to the stars, wins the ECW Title (maybe a year after Bobby Lashley held it).
Shelton Benjamin, usually a permanent resident of the WWE dog house, wins the US Title.
The trend is apparent. WWE has said that they are going after a flagging African American market, while others feel they are trying to make ammends for the comments by Hayes, especially after not firing the former Freebird.
Do you think the WWE is putting titles on African American wrestlers to make ammends for the comments by Hayes? Are they doing it to increase the market share with African Americans? Are they doing it in good faith? Or are they doing it because these guys are legitimate title holders?
Personally, this has shades of late WCW, where title reigns were commodities promised to wrestlers to sign contracts. If championships are being given to African American wrestlers simply because of their race, does that cheapen what should be an otherwise impressive accomplishment?