^^^That's what I'm seeing from people. Some dumbasses (marks) are actually saying that Triple H deserved to win, and it was actually Randy Orton's fault that their match didnt live up to expectations. That pile of shit was definantly not Orton's fault, and here's why.
First off, the match was actually okay. But there was a lot of things working against it. They had to follow HBK/Michaels, the in ring psychology sucked, and Triple H just was not over with the crowd. You can go back and listen and hear that the crowd is dead whenever Triple H is getting offense in. Even when he tried to work the crowd they were still dead. Why? Because Triple H IS NOT OVER AS A WRESTLER. That basically means that no one gives a shit about him. On the other hand, Randy Orton was very over. All Orton had to do was look at the crowd and they'd pop. So Orton did his part by getting himself over before the match.
Reason #2: Randy Orton's wrestling was crisp, fast, and he didnt botch anything. When Orton was on offense the match was actually a bit exciting and Orton did some pretty cool spots. But when Triple H was on offense everything he did looked slow and sloppy. He even botched the punt, but Orton sold it so good you really couldnt tell untill they showed the replay. So that's 2-0 in Orton's favor.
Now we get to the biggest reason that the train wreck wasnt Orton's fault, Triple H's booking. The reason why most people hated the match is the finish where Orton got man handled by Triple H. That's not Orton or any of the creative members fault. That's Triple H's fault. Triple H has that creative clause in his contract, so he can change the match to anything he wants. So evidently he changed it to a squash. Do you really think WWE's writers would end a Wrestlemania that way? I dont, So I've came to the conclusion that Triple H booked the match. Even if creative did come up with that finish, all HHH would have had to do is say he didnt like it and they would've had to change it. So this whole thing is Triple H's fault.
First off, the match was actually okay. But there was a lot of things working against it. They had to follow HBK/Michaels, the in ring psychology sucked, and Triple H just was not over with the crowd. You can go back and listen and hear that the crowd is dead whenever Triple H is getting offense in. Even when he tried to work the crowd they were still dead. Why? Because Triple H IS NOT OVER AS A WRESTLER. That basically means that no one gives a shit about him. On the other hand, Randy Orton was very over. All Orton had to do was look at the crowd and they'd pop. So Orton did his part by getting himself over before the match.
Reason #2: Randy Orton's wrestling was crisp, fast, and he didnt botch anything. When Orton was on offense the match was actually a bit exciting and Orton did some pretty cool spots. But when Triple H was on offense everything he did looked slow and sloppy. He even botched the punt, but Orton sold it so good you really couldnt tell untill they showed the replay. So that's 2-0 in Orton's favor.
Now we get to the biggest reason that the train wreck wasnt Orton's fault, Triple H's booking. The reason why most people hated the match is the finish where Orton got man handled by Triple H. That's not Orton or any of the creative members fault. That's Triple H's fault. Triple H has that creative clause in his contract, so he can change the match to anything he wants. So evidently he changed it to a squash. Do you really think WWE's writers would end a Wrestlemania that way? I dont, So I've came to the conclusion that Triple H booked the match. Even if creative did come up with that finish, all HHH would have had to do is say he didnt like it and they would've had to change it. So this whole thing is Triple H's fault.
