Oh no you didn't. LMAO. His last match was cleanly losing the belt to Austin, then having an Austin shirt draped over him.
Blind Hart mark? Reet, lets set something straight now. Shawn is an amazing performer. By far one of the best wrestlers to ever step foot in the ring. His work is amazing, and he is currently involved in one of the best feuds of the last few years. He has had countless great matches, and his WM matches go beyond even that. It's stupid to think the WWE wouldn't have benefited from him. Especially when many mark the beginning of the attitude era as a certain event in Montreal..involving Shawn
He only lost cleanly to Austin because Taker would have kicked ten colours of crap out of him if he didn't. He didn't want to drop the belt to Austin.
Whos cares if HBK was an amazing performer? whats that got to do with him being a arrogant little prick who refused in the late 1990s to drop the title to anyone? He hated the Rock. So the Rock might not have developed like he would have done with HBK around because him and Vince were holding each other's d*ck all the time at that point and HBK would have held the Rock down.
The Attitude era did not start in Montreal. Hw anyone can say that is beyond belief. Vince the boss that eveyone hated started in Montreal sure. But the Attitude era started maybe a year or so before hand. And I believe Bret and Austin started it. Not HBK.