I don't get this. I thought a legend retiring another legend was the way to go. Nobody had a problem with Undertaker retiring HBK. With that notion, John Morrison should have retired HBK or another up and comer of that time.
I understand why Cena vs Undertaker didn't happen until WM 27. Cena was the #1 face, Undertaker was still going strong. Cena wouldn't gain anything by beating Taker and they couldn't afford Cena to lose to The Undertaker. Then The Rock came.
But I just can't forgive them for not doing this match from WM 30 to 33. That's 4 great wasted Wrestlemanias.
I can also accept them doing Brock vs Taker before Cena vs Taker, since Brock's contract was going to end. Then they probably kept this match off the card because they wanted it to break 100,000 attendance record.
And then Cena gets injured....
Maybe this one was never meant to be. Sting vs Taker should have definately happened though back in Mania 31. You sign Sting for one match and the match you deliver is vs Triple H? Unforgivable.
I still hope for a classic Cena promo though "This fans want to see something, let's give it to them, Undertaker, how about one more Wrestlemania? For the fans."