Then it's logical, because they are.
They have no national television deal, are largely unknown to the televised wrestling audience, lack major sponsorships, etc.
Take it from someone who works in an industry, for a company that put
major stock into the recognition and popularity of their clients/stars. It matters, and it's what separates the "bigs" from the "littles". There's a system in place called the
Davie Brown Index (DBI) that measures these things. It's integral to anyone working in marketing. The guys on ROH's roster could walk down the street of any major metropolitan city and no one would bat an eye. The same can't be said of a good portion of the WWE roster, and a small portion of the TNA roster. Granted, TNA can't lay claim to the same level of stardom as WWE, and their performers' DBI scores would be less than the scores of WWE's performers, but they would still be higher than anything ROH could produce, aside from Maria Kanellis, who would undoubtedly score higher than any of the actual wrestlers in ROH. In fact, the only wrestlers on ROH's roster that might even score at all, in any measurable manner, are ones formerly associated with TNA, like AJ Styles and Jay Lethal. Why? Because TNA isn't an independent federation. They are, for all intents and purposes, a big league.
But this is getting too far off topic. This thread isn't about whether or not ROH are considered an indie federation or not. It's about the Wolves, who are no longer part of ROH, or the indies by definition. You not liking that does not make it untrue.