Big Nick Dudley
Nick
Honestly, I love the idea of a one-night tournament to crown the new WWE World Heavyweight Champion.
Wrestlemania IV is one of my absolute favorite Mania's, and I have been hoping for years they would go that route one more time. And with a possible unification looming, this could be the perfect year to do so.
However, a few things stand in the way. But everything has a solution:
Taker's Streak- If you're not going to have Taker win the title that night, he can't be involved in the tournament, obviously. His streak is too important to end now, and it would be borderline retarted to do so. I have no problem with Taker winning the one-night tournament, but I'm not sure WWE would want to go that route. So either Taker wins it, or just doesn't participate (has a grudge match instead).
Personal Feuds- With a tournament like this, it's much harder to build personal feuds. It's nowhere near impossible to do so, but it would take a lot of creativity.
Royal Rumble Winner- The Rumble winner is guaranteed a title match..so how does the tournament work? The winner of the Royal Rumble before Mania 4 didn't have a title shot due to his victory, so it wasn't a problem. I say the best way to handle this problem is for the Rumble winner to cash his Rumble victory clause in early, and have that match end in a ton of controversy. That man should (non-kayfabe) be written into the Finals match, to make up for an underwhelming Rumble-match-win outcome.
The biggest problem I see is how do you justify not just having the two champions (WWE and WCH) duke it out to see who takes the unified title. Both titles will have to be held up, or vacated, before Mania. Both titles will have to be vacated in controversial fashion, and I'm not sure how you go about doing that in a creative, credible way. Maybe both title matches at Elimination Chamber go bad?
I just know that it's high time the WWE had another WWE Heavyweight title tournament at Mania. Who ends up in the finals? If Taker is in the tournament, he's going to win it. I don't have a problem with that, but I see where some would. It takes away from the surprise element of things a bit.
I would say the finals can feature just about anyone you want. You aren't advertising two actual wrestlers, you are advertising a tournament, and a tournament will draw just as well as your two biggest names would. I hope they go this route, I really do.
Wrestlemania IV is one of my absolute favorite Mania's, and I have been hoping for years they would go that route one more time. And with a possible unification looming, this could be the perfect year to do so.
However, a few things stand in the way. But everything has a solution:
Taker's Streak- If you're not going to have Taker win the title that night, he can't be involved in the tournament, obviously. His streak is too important to end now, and it would be borderline retarted to do so. I have no problem with Taker winning the one-night tournament, but I'm not sure WWE would want to go that route. So either Taker wins it, or just doesn't participate (has a grudge match instead).
Personal Feuds- With a tournament like this, it's much harder to build personal feuds. It's nowhere near impossible to do so, but it would take a lot of creativity.
Royal Rumble Winner- The Rumble winner is guaranteed a title match..so how does the tournament work? The winner of the Royal Rumble before Mania 4 didn't have a title shot due to his victory, so it wasn't a problem. I say the best way to handle this problem is for the Rumble winner to cash his Rumble victory clause in early, and have that match end in a ton of controversy. That man should (non-kayfabe) be written into the Finals match, to make up for an underwhelming Rumble-match-win outcome.
The biggest problem I see is how do you justify not just having the two champions (WWE and WCH) duke it out to see who takes the unified title. Both titles will have to be held up, or vacated, before Mania. Both titles will have to be vacated in controversial fashion, and I'm not sure how you go about doing that in a creative, credible way. Maybe both title matches at Elimination Chamber go bad?
I just know that it's high time the WWE had another WWE Heavyweight title tournament at Mania. Who ends up in the finals? If Taker is in the tournament, he's going to win it. I don't have a problem with that, but I see where some would. It takes away from the surprise element of things a bit.
I would say the finals can feature just about anyone you want. You aren't advertising two actual wrestlers, you are advertising a tournament, and a tournament will draw just as well as your two biggest names would. I hope they go this route, I really do.