How Will WWE Explain Orton, Punk, Cena, Kelly Kelly Not Walking Out? | Page 2 | WrestleZone Forums

How Will WWE Explain Orton, Punk, Cena, Kelly Kelly Not Walking Out?

it would be WWE/F style to have them locked in the back by someone, definatly wouldn't suprise me; but leaving this unanswered wouldn't really be fair to our limited yet partially competent intelligence.

Locked in back by Laurendoucheis, the 6 youngsters, maybe even Vince.

Or they come out with full support when HHH comes out to accept his resignation.

Or, with a dick move, the WWE gives us nothing and we weren't supposed to notice them not being there in the first place
 
no!!!!! people are actually wanting HBK to return? o god no. I was just starting to like wrestling again but then HHH returns every raw. Hell, I can live with that, but then comes also Nash and now people are talking about HBK. I really hope not, let him stay retired. he had enough spotlight.
 
I'm going to say.. for the faces that did walk out they were heavily out numbered by the heels due to the fact that the big name faces such as Cena, Orton, Punk, Sheamus or even injured stars such as Big Show, Kane and so forth weren't out there. I'd say its simply because all the ones who weren't out there have been around for years and in storyline terms agree with the whole "this is wrestling, have a problem? fight about it" thing HHH was going on about.

Also why would Lawler walk out? Mark Henry was the reason why he got injured and Mark Henry got a $250,000 fine for it. Isn't that retribution? One more thing, didn't the original Nexus & John Cena do the exact same thing (In Cena's case just to attack the Nexus). No one cried then. This was a good way to make allot of the heels look like a bunch of *****es and the only reason the faces walked out was because they were heavily out numbered and didn't really have a choice.

Finally. Isn't Mark Henry the biggest threat right now? Injuring Big Show, Kane, Stage hands, Drew, Lawler. Tried to injure Sheamus and Orton. He got a World Title out of it. He did receive a $250,000 fine but doesn't that put him in the same league as Miz/Truth besides the fact that he still has a job?

Spot on, Lawler blaming the 'higher power' was a bit fo a joke. All he ahd to do was point at Mark Henry as the fault for his injury the other week.

Mark Henry made no sense been there aswell. He has caused as many problems as Truth and Miz.

Bad booking that....plotholes.
 
Mark Henry was out there cause he, like Barrett, is ok with chaos and destruction as long as HE is the one causing it. I feel Lawler walked out due to him doing what is best for the roster as a whole more so than himself. He did say that it may not directing be HHH's fault but cause he is in charge he has to take responsibiiity. I really would like to see Rock, Cena, Punk, Sheamus, and HHH vs. Miz, Truth, Nash, Christian, and Del Rio at SS to culminate the angle.

Also, maybe the reason the walk out happened now is because people are not as afraid of HHH as they were of Vince McMahon. No one ever did a walk out on Vince but there has been a threat to walk out on HHH (2000) and a walkout. Maybe it is trying to get over that he is too soft to be a leader of the entire company? That the talent feel they can walk all over him because they view him as a co-worker rather than a boss?

CM Punk said it best in one of his radio interview he did with I think its called The BS Report, DONT BE SO JADED. Let the angle play out. Just because you don't know exactly where its going doesn't mean its a bad angle. Everything that happens has a purpose.

WWE has NOT forgotten about the RAW GM hence why the laptop is constantly at ringside. This could be the big wrap up of the anonymous GM angle where it was whoever the RAW GM is leading the charge (Vince did hire the GM after all).
 
It makes no sense that CM Punk wasn't out there. Just 2 weeks ago he wanted HHH fired. He should have been out there for the vote of confidence. Makes no sense. WWE just tries too hard to protect their baby faces sometimes and goes against all logic.
 
I'm gonna start by saying they didn't want their top faces being booed so they kept them in the back to keep that from happening. http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/243...not-come-to-ringside-during-final-raw-segment
It makes no sense that CM Punk wasn't out there. Just 2 weeks ago he wanted HHH fired. He should have been out there for the vote of confidence. Makes no sense. WWE just tries too hard to protect their baby faces sometimes and goes against all logic.
It makes perfect sense. CM punk said that he realized Triple H wasn't at fault and he didn't blame him for it anymore, he blames whoever was in the back pulling the strings.
 
Cena 'The company guy' shudda come out on stage. He bleeds WWE does he not? He wants the company to continue and without talent it cant.

I hope he comes out next week and rectifies this, or even tonight on Smackdown. I dont like plotholes!
 
I understand that WWE did not want their top stars like Punk, Cena, Sheamus etc to be booed if they came out for the Confidence voting but .......... wouldn't that make things more believable? Or what if they came out afterwards to stand by Triple H and show that they are not going to be swayed by the rest of the locker room. Triple H has done a really good job of COO so far and I almost think that instead of having someone sabotage Hunter's run as COO why not just come out and say we don't like what your doing and don't want you running the WWE?

I'm almost betting that Stephanie, Shane, Vince or maybe even John Laurinitis are behind this ~ guess we'll see as the story unfolds!
 
I think a lot of you are missing several of the points, especially with the whole Lawler/Henry aspect of the angle and the "no explanation."

First of all, the point of Triple H receiving the vote of no confidence was because people like Nash, The Miz and R-Truth, who were fired are showing up at shows, getting past security and attacking the employees under Triple H's watch. Stuff like that didn't happen with Vince, with the exception of the nWo, who Vince implemented in the first place, and the Nexxus, which Triple H mentioned. Not because Mark Henry is attacking everyone. That stuff has always happened and it always will. Any wrestler [kayfabe] with half a brain would have to expect that the day he signs his/her contract.

The other point I'd like to make real quick is to those of you who are seemingly pissed that there was no explanation. What do you expect? All of this to unfold in one night? The point is to keep us interested so that we'll tune in next week and the week after and buy Survivor Series.

Furthermore I thought last night's closing segment was awesome. Truly the best part of any RAW I've seen since C.M. Punk's "shoot." The only thing I thought was missing [obviously] was the lack of Orton, Cena, Punk, Sheamus, etc. during the segment. I guess the only explanation is that they'll be on team Triple H for Survivor Series. What I can't figure out is if their opponents are going to be simply just anti-Triple H or if it will be something like Team Conspiracy with the Miz and R-Truth at the helm, or a combination of the two. Either way, I've continually been impressed with the product as a whole for the most part. I can't help but think that Triple H has really been making a difference on the creative end as of late. Either that or Vince found some decent writers during his most recent hiring/firing phase.
 
I think it will be remarkably easy to explain why Orton, Punk, Cena, KK, Eve, Sheamus, and possibly a few others were absent from ringside and not part of the vote of no confidence and part of the mass exodus at the end of RAW last night. Simply put, they likely have no problem with the (kayfabe) manner in which the COO is running the company. If they are OK with the status of the company and their own personal safety, there's no reason to be there and no reason to participate in any vote. Plus, as others have said, some of you are very impatient and appear to be unable to allow the progression of the storyline. They can't reveal everything in one night; maybe next week they will explain their loyalty, leading into the ultimate development of the storyline heading into Survivor Series.

I'm a little perplexed as to why the divas left, especially the divas of doom. I also don't understand why Booker or Jim Ross left either, or a few of the lesser faces such as Alex Riley. But that's fine, I'm sure that will be explained in good time. I'm sure they would never dream of leaving a storyline with plot holes or inconsistencies or incompletions. I would imagine if this were at risk of happening, our anonymous General Manager would come on there and explain it all to us.
 
I think it is a smart move keeping Punk away from Triple H, assuming they want to keep Punk as a babyface. Triple H was hurting Punk face push...the crowd is still very into HHH more than Punk.

But I dont want to see Punk start teaming up with Triple H. I think that would hurt his current character. I mean he was trying to get the guy fired a couple of weeks ago. :lmao:. It would just make Punk look like a confused douchebag.

I really think Punk will start a program with Del Rio for the WWE championship. I think they will wrestle each other at SS. If you notice the whole conspiracy angle has been centered around Triple H not Punk.
 
I can at least sort of explain Punk, going off of his Twitter. He A. thinks that walking out is a pussy move, and B. says he can't bring change to the WWE if he's not actually there.
 
The people who were not present for the walking out moment are all top people of their divisions. Cena, Orton, and Punk are currently the top three guys while Kelly is the most popular diva and top face of that division. I think WWE will explain their absence by having them side with Trips because the obvious next step will be for someone, anyone, to take his side. If everyone else walked out then who would help him when Miz, Truth, Nash, and Laurinaitis inevitably confront him as a group? Someone would have to step up. Cena, Punk, and Orton all sound like the perfect guys for that job. Kelly's tougher to figure out. Maybe they will use that as part of an angle to get her a rematch with Beth or something.
 
I think it's obvious that Cena, Punk, Sheamus and Orton will be on the pro-WWE side of the massive tag team match at Survivor Series, with probably two more (HHH/Rock/Austin/Taker) against Miz, Truth, Nash, Del Rio and a couple others.

I didn't think about it, but Dagger's point about Kelly's allegiance to HHH resulting in a title shot (or two) down the line makes a lot of sense.
 
I think it's obvious that Cena, Punk, Sheamus and Orton will be on the pro-WWE side of the massive tag team match at Survivor Series, with probably two more (HHH/Rock/Austin/Taker) against Miz, Truth, Nash, Del Rio and a couple others.

I didn't think about it, but Dagger's point about Kelly's allegiance to HHH resulting in a title shot (or two) down the line makes a lot of sense.


I personally see Del Rio vs CM Punk for the WWE Title at Survivor Series with Punk going over. WWE Title match is needed on the card.

I think you can pretty much guarantee Cena and Rock will be on Triple H's team. Other members potentailly Orton and Sheamus. May even throw the Big Show or Kane in there.
 
Like I already said, I know they were not there because they will mostly side with HHH and they wanted their dramatic finale of everyone walking out, but to me it's a missed opportunity, I wanted them to come and back HHH that night, why did they wait a whole week to back him up in kaybafe?

And like someone else mentionned, they also missed the boat with Ryder and the small group of faces that should have stay and enter the ring with HHH right then and now, it would have made them even more popular and they would become a target from the heels and would really help sell the dynamic of face/heel.

But that's just my opinion, next week they will probably come out and help HHH but still, we'll see.
 
What if someone took them out after the match? What if there is a mole in them who is secretly working for "Team Conspiracy"? That could be an option though not the greatest option I guess because all the guys who did not show up are doing very well as babyfaces at this moment. Well, that is everyone except Mason Ryan. Hmm that does make me think, is Ryan going to get the monster heel push after all?

But I guess that this will just end up being a plot device. WWE obviously wanted to show that no one was on HHH's side and how no one believes in him. At the same time they did not want to get their babyfaces booed. I do have a feeling that WWE will explain it in some way. Lately, under the Triple H regime they have been showing a tendency to explain even the smallest of matters like Punk returning just after Cena won the title against Cena. So I guess there will be an explanation but not a terribly exciting one like I envisioned here.
 
I apologize if i missed a post but no one has mentioned that this survivor series is the 10th anniversary of the WINNER TAKE ALL WCW vs WWF match. Wouldn't be surprised if we saw some sort of similar angle come to pass.

Would love to see HHH and Punk reveal they were in on it together to occupy the main events and prove that MIz/Truth were right all along. Leading to them turning face and being joined by Cena, Nash, and Rock. Don't really wanna sit here and type out the whole thing so that it makes sense to everyone but, figure it out yourselves how that could make sense.
 
I expect Cena,Punk etc to come out next week and say how despite their differences they support Triple H and tell everyone else to quit their moaning and bitching. How about The Rock adding his support to Triple H too ?

It could go a number of ways which is good to see.
 
How will WWE explain the big faces not walking out?

Simple - they're the guys who still have confidence in Triple H.

And with regards to Punk: He's already said he respects Helmsley and now believes the 'conspiracy' is the work of someone else.
 
Simple - they're the guys who still have confidence in Triple H.

And with regards to Punk: He's already said he respects Helmsley and now believes the 'conspiracy' is the work of someone else.


I hate that! What happened to Doofus son-in-law? Punk should be one of the loudest people saying HHH is incompetant. Holy back flip Batman!

Does everyone remember when Orton got over because he was bad ass in 2002 I think, and then became a fan loving guy and how it bombed. Then John Morrison was this cool, Guru of Greatness and they turned him inot a fan loving guy and now that's bombed...

Same with Edge and they turned him heel almost immediately to stop the backlash.. or more so the cricket's chirping when he walked out...

I can see it happeneing to Punk if WWE are not too careful...
 
I think this will be used as part of the storyline next week. But I read like most other people that they didn't want their top faces getting heat from the audience by walking out on HHH since he is technically a face. So I'm assuming the storyline will be these faces going against the majority of the talent (who were mostly heels or mid to lower card talent)that voted "no confidence". Kind of like the show must go on type of deal.
 
There are other stars who werent there. For example: John Morrison, Daniel Bryan, Ted DiBiase, Tyson Kidd, Drew McIntyre, Heath Slater and many more. Explain this!!!!
 
You said it yourself. They're the super faces. They will all come out and say the same thing:

"We didn't walk out because we love this company and just want to do our jobs. When we're put at such a high risk that it can't be ignored then maybe, but other then that there is no point."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top