Really?
Really?
Do you have a better idea?
And don't say putting it on CM Punk or getting rid of it. As much as I am a CM Punk fan, putting the belt on him for the 4th time would be a slap to the face to the 3 previous times he won/held it.
All the mid-card titles are meaningless. The MITB briefcases are more meaningful than the WHC right now. This is a way to make the title more meaningful.
If Sandow or Rhodes win the title at some point down the road. Say when the Royal Rumble comes around, the holder of the WHC has the opportunity to cash in the title for a match for the WWE Championship. Tell me that doesn't make holding the WHC more meaningful.
They should seriously go back to only one MITB match & briefcase.
Yes Really!!
and once again having the WHC a cash in for a match for the wwe championship is one of the worst ideas i've ever heard, It would make the WHC meaningless not meaningful
All the WHC title needs is to be taken seriously by wwe and won by guys like CM Punk and close out shows every once and a while, what killing the championship is the fact it's opens PPV's and fueds are taking a back seat to not just the wwe championship but to other fueds aswell, For example on Smackdown where the WHC is suppose to be the Main Championship of the show and main storylines but at the moment the main storyline on Smackdown is Sandow-Rhodes, and on Raw obviously the Bryan-Cena storyline but also the Wyatt-Kane fued, all wwe do for the World Championship fued is have Del Rio in a match and have Christian interupt or do commentary. There is absolutely no build for this title.
All wwe need to do is make the storylines primary storyline next to the wwe title fued, but if wwe are not prepared to do that then just get rid of the championship now.