How did we have such a fun but such a dissapointing and least starstudded rumble? | WrestleZone Forums

How did we have such a fun but such a dissapointing and least starstudded rumble?

I was thinking the exact same thing.

It was entertaining as hell, yet I feel somehow disappointed. Big Show at #30 was the big let down for me - I had my hopes set on some massive surprise.
 
Who the fuck else did you want in it? Cena and Punk were the only major stars not in it. And no, Kane and a one legged Mark Henry don't count as major stars. A 40 man Rumble just would have added 10 filler guys that weren't needed.
 
How was it disappointing? The show was entertaining as hell from beginning to end, what the fuck else do you need?
 
Kane > Show
Regal > Cole
Tatsu > King
McIntrye/Hawkins/Clay > Ortunga

And I am peeved at Khali falling like a regular wrestler when they were buying time for the entrants. Giants shouldn't be brought down so easily by the likes of Rhodes with a a few chops.
 
Who the fuck else did you want in it? Cena and Punk were the only major stars not in it. And no, Kane and a one legged Mark Henry don't count as major stars. A 40 man Rumble just would have added 10 filler guys that weren't needed.

Come on, Big Sexy, be reasonable! There was no return of Brock Lesnar and Steve Austin and Shawn Michaels and the Undertaker, the PPV had to have sucked :rolleyes:
 
Im not the only one who had fun throughout but then realized I was dissapointed at the outcome.

You still haven't answered my question of who else you wanted to see in the Rumble. First you say there weren't enough stars but don't give names of who else could have been in there. Then you say it should have been 40 men. Then you completely contradict the 40 man rumble statement by saying half the rumble was jobbers thus making it somewhat disappointing.
 
Tatsu > King
128901093778284444.jpg
 
You still haven't answered my question of who else you wanted to see in the Rumble. First you say there weren't enough stars but don't give names of who else could have been in there. Then you say it should have been 40 men. Then you completely contradict the 40 man rumble statement by saying half the rumble was jobbers thus making it somewhat disappointing.

The way the rumble was structered and who came out and who was eliminated just felt to weird, the show even endend fifteen minutes before it was billed to. It just would have made more sense to have 40 men and have more people who were established than rather have almost all it's spots go to jobbers and comedy acts.
 
The way the rumble was structered and who came out and who was eliminated just felt to weird, the show even endend fifteen minutes before it was billed to. It just would have made more sense to have 40 men and have more people who were established than rather have almost all it's spots go to jobbers and comedy acts.

I'm going to ask one more time since you obviously aren't fully comprehending. WHO would you have put in the match instead and who would you have put in to make it 40 men? It's not like they were leaving out a bunch of huge names. All they had left was the likes of Regal, Tatsu, Jimmy Uso, Tyson Kidd, Curt Hawkins, JTG, Tyler Reks. You are complaining about too many jobbers and trying to add more jobbers at the same time.
 
Yes. Would make for better spots. Since lack of star power is something that cannot be remedied, might as well make the spots better.

Exactly what spots would Kane, Regal, Tatsu, and Curt Hawkins have been able to do? Kane would have done exactly what the Big Show did, get a few quick eliminations and then eliminated by Orton. Regal is in his mid 40's and would have done nothing, I'd much rather see Cole make a fool out of himself for 90 seconds and be scared shitless by Kharma. Guys like Tatsu, Hawkins, and McIntyre are completely irrelevant at this point and Brodus Clay needs to just keep having his one minute squashes for the time being.
 
So do you run from every question that is asked of you or is this something new you are trying out? I feel like I'm arguing with Deexter.

Sorry that somebody else proved my point for me, do you get super uptight about every thread in the spam section that disagrees with your views or is this new?
 
Exactly what spots would Kane, Regal, Tatsu, and Curt Hawkins have been able to do? Kane would have done exactly what the Big Show did, get a few quick eliminations and then eliminated by Orton. Regal is in his mid 40's and would have done nothing, I'd much rather see Cole make a fool out of himself for 90 seconds and be scared shitless by Kharma. Guys like Tatsu, Hawkins, and McIntyre are completely irrelevant at this point and Brodus Clay needs to just keep having his one minute squashes for the time being.

But Kane would have gotten a bigger reaction doing the same spot than Show due to his Rumble history no?

Regal can do the same spot with Kharma too. And also having the whole announce team as 'surprise' entrants ruined any *surprise* after the first two went up. Regal can attempt his brass knucks gimmick too.

Yes the last few guys are irrelevant but I rather irrelevant guys that I like over irrelevant guys that I don't. Personal preference on them really. They were just folders for the superstars to pad up eliminations anyway.
 
But Kane would have gotten a bigger reaction doing the same spot than Show due to his Rumble history no?

Maybe slightly but nothing that would have been so amazing that it made the match any better. Plus with the way the storyline with Cena is going, it doesn't make sense for Kane to enter the Rumble. He doesn't care about anything right now but making Cena "embrace the hate."

Regal can do the same spot with Kharma too. And also having the whole announce team as 'surprise' entrants ruined any *surprise* after the first two went up. Regal can attempt his brass knucks gimmick too.

Outside of dancing with Brodus Clay and about a minute of guest commentary on RAW, when was the last time Regal was featured in any type of role on one of the main shows?

Yes the last few guys are irrelevant but I rather irrelevant guys that I like over irrelevant guys that I don't. Personal preference on them really. They were just folders for the superstars to pad up eliminations anyway.

So basically it makes the Rumble better for you personally but in the grand scheme of things is irrelevant.
 
Sorry that somebody else proved my point for me, do you get super uptight about every thread in the spam section that disagrees with your views or is this new?

No one proved anything and no one is uptight. You made a statement that I questioned and disagreed with. You then failed to respond back with anything of substance or with an answer to my question. If you don't like being responded to in a negative fashion then maybe you shouldn't be posting on a forum driven by back and forth discussion.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top