Doctor Awesome
Pre-Show Stalwart
i was just watching a replay of this past weeks Impact, and during the promo by Daivari i hought back to Mohammed Hassan and his very short run in WWE. at the time if you had told me that Daivari would be the one out of that twosome with a job i would have asked you where you bought your crack!
personally, i thought that beyond the character, the guy that was MH (i think his name was something like Mark Magnus) had a good amount of talent; the look, very very good mic skills, athletic and could sell very well, something i think that tends to be overloooked too often. within 6 months he got more heat than anyone in WWE programming, obviously the sensitivity of the gimmick's content was very close to home, an undoubtably was his demise. when the program with Taker got started the WWE really pushed the envelope with the storyline and brought some very negative media attn to the company, leaving them with no other alternative than to kill the messenger. it seemed very harsh to release the guy when he was only doing what he was told, and really, it was a loss for the company because he could have been repackaged over time and been a real asset to the company. it was said that when he left he went to pursue acting.....well.......has anyone in the L.A. area seen him bartending or waiting tables cause i am yet to see him get his big Hollywood break.
So my question is this, after 4 years have passed, do you think that the WWE did the right thing in releasing Mohammed Hassan for the sins of the father and if he had not been let go what type of role do you think he could play in today's modern WWE if he were repackaged?
personally, i thought that beyond the character, the guy that was MH (i think his name was something like Mark Magnus) had a good amount of talent; the look, very very good mic skills, athletic and could sell very well, something i think that tends to be overloooked too often. within 6 months he got more heat than anyone in WWE programming, obviously the sensitivity of the gimmick's content was very close to home, an undoubtably was his demise. when the program with Taker got started the WWE really pushed the envelope with the storyline and brought some very negative media attn to the company, leaving them with no other alternative than to kill the messenger. it seemed very harsh to release the guy when he was only doing what he was told, and really, it was a loss for the company because he could have been repackaged over time and been a real asset to the company. it was said that when he left he went to pursue acting.....well.......has anyone in the L.A. area seen him bartending or waiting tables cause i am yet to see him get his big Hollywood break.
So my question is this, after 4 years have passed, do you think that the WWE did the right thing in releasing Mohammed Hassan for the sins of the father and if he had not been let go what type of role do you think he could play in today's modern WWE if he were repackaged?