Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D.
Kamehamehaaaaa!!
Dean Ambrose has always been the guy that fans wanted to be pushed in two consecutive Wrestlemanias at the main event, instead of Roman Reigns.
Wrestlemania 31, fans wanted Ziggler, or Ambrose, or Bryan to win. They didn't want Roman, because he "wasn't ready" and that "Daniel Bryan deserves a solid run as a champion".
Wrestlemania 32 again fans wanted Ambrose to win the Rumble. Then they wanted him to beat Triple at Roadblock. Then they wanted Ambrose vs Lesnar to be for the title.
And finally Dean Ambrose won the big one at Money In The Bank..
Here's my problem with Dean though. In every big test he had, he somewhat failed to raise the odds. His match with Lesnar at Wrestlemania was not what we expected it to be, his programm with Jericho was not what we expect it to be. The shield triple threat really didn't steal any show and definately won't go down as the most talked or the best triple threat match in history as some people thought it would be. His match with Ziggler at Summerslam was ok and now he will most likely drop the belt to AJ Styles at the coming month, or maybe, in 5 days.
Dean Ambrose was great as a chaser. He was great as an IC Champ. But what I'm seeing here (and this is a problem with the whole New Era), from the moment one talent wins the world title, they stop progressing. Like that. Dean Ambrose? He's the same guy he was one year ago only with a title on his shoulders.
And that goes for everybody. What progress or difference has Rollins or Reings showed since last year? Nothing much.
If you're not getting what I'm talking about let me set some examples.
Daniel Bryan: 2011-2012-2013. Compare those years of Bryan and you will se something, you will se evolution.
The Rock: 1998-1999-2000-2001. The Rock went from rookie to main eventer to main attraction to one of the greatest of all time, in 4 years! Every year The Rock reached a new level a new high point.
Edge: 2006-2007-2008. You get the point.
Cena: 2005-2006-2007.
The list can go on and on. However, the talents of the New Era do not follow suit. Roman Reigns really didn't bring anything more to the table from Wrestlemania 31 to Wrestlemania 32 and he still doesn't.
Ambrose only gained more popularity.
What I am saying is that, it feels like those guys peak the moment they become world champions and never get any bigger after that. It can't be only me who is seeing that.
And that's exactly how I feel about Ambrose as well, mostly due to the fact that everybody wanted him to get the keys and not Roman. His title reign has been forgettable really, he lacked a big feud.
But he also had chances with big feuds when feuding with Lesnar and Y2J.
So, am I seeing things? What's the problem here?
Wrestlemania 31, fans wanted Ziggler, or Ambrose, or Bryan to win. They didn't want Roman, because he "wasn't ready" and that "Daniel Bryan deserves a solid run as a champion".
Wrestlemania 32 again fans wanted Ambrose to win the Rumble. Then they wanted him to beat Triple at Roadblock. Then they wanted Ambrose vs Lesnar to be for the title.
And finally Dean Ambrose won the big one at Money In The Bank..
Here's my problem with Dean though. In every big test he had, he somewhat failed to raise the odds. His match with Lesnar at Wrestlemania was not what we expected it to be, his programm with Jericho was not what we expect it to be. The shield triple threat really didn't steal any show and definately won't go down as the most talked or the best triple threat match in history as some people thought it would be. His match with Ziggler at Summerslam was ok and now he will most likely drop the belt to AJ Styles at the coming month, or maybe, in 5 days.
Dean Ambrose was great as a chaser. He was great as an IC Champ. But what I'm seeing here (and this is a problem with the whole New Era), from the moment one talent wins the world title, they stop progressing. Like that. Dean Ambrose? He's the same guy he was one year ago only with a title on his shoulders.
And that goes for everybody. What progress or difference has Rollins or Reings showed since last year? Nothing much.
If you're not getting what I'm talking about let me set some examples.
Daniel Bryan: 2011-2012-2013. Compare those years of Bryan and you will se something, you will se evolution.
The Rock: 1998-1999-2000-2001. The Rock went from rookie to main eventer to main attraction to one of the greatest of all time, in 4 years! Every year The Rock reached a new level a new high point.
Edge: 2006-2007-2008. You get the point.
Cena: 2005-2006-2007.
The list can go on and on. However, the talents of the New Era do not follow suit. Roman Reigns really didn't bring anything more to the table from Wrestlemania 31 to Wrestlemania 32 and he still doesn't.
Ambrose only gained more popularity.
What I am saying is that, it feels like those guys peak the moment they become world champions and never get any bigger after that. It can't be only me who is seeing that.
And that's exactly how I feel about Ambrose as well, mostly due to the fact that everybody wanted him to get the keys and not Roman. His title reign has been forgettable really, he lacked a big feud.
But he also had chances with big feuds when feuding with Lesnar and Y2J.
So, am I seeing things? What's the problem here?