wrestlingfan
Championship Contender
He needs a gimmick, better, mic skills, ring talent. I like Gunner but I'm not completely sold on him. He could be repackaged.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
How many moves in the world of wrestling are actually unique these days?
The F5 is perfectly fine. Noone is currently using the move in either TNA or WWE so hes not stepping on anyones toes. The only person in recent memory to have used it was Brock Lesnar who has since left the industry.
The move has credibility as a high impact finisher its quick, its not overly complicated, it doesnt look like it could be reversed by simply moving 2 steps to the left. He could put his own little twist on it, sure, but I have absolutely no issue with him using it.
The F5 has name recognition, we all know who made it famous and it gets people talking about the new guy using it.
Watch Alex Shelley
In any case I think Gunner is fine, he actually works out unlike alot of TNA talent and has just been pushed too hard as of late is all. Give him time, he'll work out.
Crimosn's the one I can't stand. This guy is leading the BFG series and yet where is he? Haven't seen him in weeks. I guess I could have a 6 month undefeated streak too if in the last 6 months I was on tv only 4 times...
worst undefeated streak ever... the poster that said no skills, no charisma etc etc.. well that's how I feel about Crimson...
How many moves in the world of wrestling are actually unique these days?
The F5 is perfectly fine. Noone is currently using the move in either TNA or WWE so hes not stepping on anyones toes. The only person in recent memory to have used it was Brock Lesnar who has since left the industry.
The move has credibility as a high impact finisher its quick, its not overly complicated, it doesnt look like it could be reversed by simply moving 2 steps to the left. He could put his own little twist on it, sure, but I have absolutely no issue with him using it.
The F5 has name recognition, we all know who made it famous and it gets people talking about the new guy using it.
What's missing is pretty simple to me: character. TNA can shove Gunner down the viewer's throats all they want, have him beat all the estabished stars and even the top champions all they want, but until they give him some character the audience has nothing to grab hold of. He's just a generic wrestler winning matches right now.. with no personality and no character to separate him from anyone else. Its the same problem with Crimson.
They're trying to rehash Goldberg in a sense, by making these unknown wrestlers just win matches and go on streaks, but Goldberg had a "mystique" about him. He was unique for his time, and you can't recreate that mystique because its been done before. So the mystery isn't a pro for these TNA wrestlers as it was for Goldberg its now a con and TNA needs to show more of who Gunner is to the audience so they have something to relate to and get behind. I have no problem with his ability in the ring, or his look for that matter, he just needs some personality and a gimmick that sets him a part from others right now, and that's whats missing.
Not to mention him being connected to Immortal right now is a negative because its holding him back; he's seen as nothing but a lackey far down the line of importance in that stable, where if he wasn't in Immortal he'd likely be taken more seriously.
You mind actually telling us what the heck this Universal Soldier gimmick is? On-topic, he's one of my favorites in TNA, though his lack of gimmick means I can't really get behind him in any sort of storyline thus far. He's far better than Crimson, that's for sure.From me the love comes from the fact I saw him before TNA, he has had awesome matches. You know that American Wolf guy, you know the RoH World Champion? Guess who beat him in the 2009 NWA Legends Cup Finals in a 15 Minute match that was fantastic? The Universal Soldier Phil Shatter/Gunner. Who is the longest reigning NWA National Heavyweight Champion in history? Dusty Rhodes? Tully Blanchard? Ric Flair? Nope. The Universal Soldier Phil Shatter/Gunner.
My "Love" for Gunner comes from knowing how good he actually is, how good he has made people look, and how badly TNA is dropping the ball with him. Shatter/Gunner could easily be a TNA Main Eventer if they played off of his Universal Soldier Persana, one he had for six years and was way over with.
I don't think the group thing hurts at this juncture. I mean, the group is too big so in that sense, it does hurt, but maybe it will help moving forward.
I would liken his position to another guy from like 2003. Generic big guy with some crazy tattoos gets put in a big heel group. Others in the group are talked about more, but he ends up becoming a big star with the right storyline. His name? Dave Bautista.
The difference between the two though is Batista was a lot bigger and was billed as such. Gunner is "Mr. Intensity" but doesn't do anything intense. Batista was "Evolution's Animal" and while he never spoke, his offense was brutal. If Gunner is to make an impact (no pun intended), he needs to be like THAT on offense. Be stiffer, hit more high impact power moves. Make it look like you HURT people in your matches. Then do the little things like get the anger going when you brutalize another victim. Do THAT and maybe we'd take you seriously as an "intense" guy.
So basically, I just wanted to kinda give you a response to your point on the group holding it back. It doesn't really, but the lack of character and the overall bland presentation of the fella is what does hold him back.