I don't mind some of the themed PPVs, since two of the "Big Four" were original concepts as a theme (Royal Rumble and Survivor Series of course). However, with some I think are just downright dumb (HIAC, TLC, F4W). Looking at the way WWE books, which is quite stupid, they will do whatever they think will sell. Extreme Rules is the ONLY properly booked PPV theme, with every match having a stipulation. Night of Champions was the same way, until they started adding in NON-TITLE MATCHES. What do all of the crappy themed PPV's (except Fatal 4 Way) have in common? Not a real feud blowoff.
Hell in a Cell - World Title Matches in a Cell with no feud blowoff
TLC - See above
Fatal 4 Way - Concept was cool, stale when majority of matches are 4-way
Capitol Punishment - Great concept, just a standard PPV in the Nation's capitol
Breaking Point - All themed matches were good, standard feud ending/continuation but failed in buyrates
-Money In the Bank should be altered; have six qualifying matches (two tag team matches, three singles, and a 3/4 way) on the PPV and they meet in the main-event for the briefcase.
-Elimination Chamber I'm fine with. Perfect setup for post-Rumble and pre-Mania
-Night of Champions needs to be all matches for titles or a #1 contender match
-Over the Limit is just a standard PPV name, no worries there
Themed PPVs need something that sells; all titles on the line? check. All matches with stipulations? Check. Spin the wheel, make the deal for the stipulation? RAW Roulette of course. WCW nailed it. WWE fails at it. WCW had BattleBowl and Wrestling World Cup, while WWE does PPV's with gimmick match names.