67 to 25 (as of this writing)? That's insulting.
...No doubt in my mind the first match would be a classic with Liger surprising Sting for the victory. Then Sting would rebound, take the second fall quite easily. The third is the interesting one. Apparently Liger has never been in a cage match. His high flying would definitely be on point in this match, but Sting has been in a cage match before and knows what to expect and what to dish out.
It boils down to this. Liger knows a million ways to put away an opponent. Sting knows a million and one...
Technique, skill, speed, agility, power, resilience. These are all strengths Liger possesses (and in some amount far greater than his opponent) . Why would it be surprising for Liger to win?
Liger has competed in brutal street-fight type matches
and has a gimmick specifically for those occasions, in which to beat him you have to kayfabe paralyze the guy. Why would Sting win the Street fight? And why would the supposed victory be achieved "quite easily"?
What about a cage match is so mystifying? As a high flier, and an overall athletic human being in general, I'm confident in Liger's ability to raise one foot above the other and climb. If he can get to the top rope with so much vaunted speed and agility, that we all claim he has, why won't he just keep on going to the top of the cage? Up and over isn't a hard concept. Likewise as a member of the civilized world he's adept and experienced at entering and exiting through doorways. The rest boils down to a pro-wrestling match in a pro-wrestling ring, and to be damn sure, he's really good at those too.
At best, Sting proponents are saying he'll just barely win because:
- "Liger knows a million ways to put away an opponent. Sting knows a million and one." Even if I were to agree, What exactly is that one way I wonder? Was Liger absent that day at wrestling school? Why with a million likely possibilities would this be the one match that employs it?
- "...since the match keeps both men grounded, Sting is gonna squeeze it out." Already spoke about how none of the matches ground them.
- "Sting wins this in a 3 fall classic after he escapes the cage before Liger does by a split second." How is it that the acknowledged faster, and more agile man is the one that loses a split second race to the finish?
Can we all at least be upfront and honest and say the majority of people here who voted know little about Liger's career? Or that they voted Sting for no other valid reason than they know him more, or like him more, or God forbid because he's taller, and/or American, and/or wrestled in American promotions? Which by the way is perfectly valid per the rules of this contest and their right to do, but at least say so.
Watch Sting's matches, watch Liger's; In their overall bodies of work there's nothing that supports Sting being so far ahead, let alone winning at all. Not back when they were starting out, not in their primes, and certainly not even today. Borden isn't the better in-ring worker in any measurable way. Arguably he had the bigger career, but he's simple not a better performer in the ring (where this match-up happens to take place). Liger should be going on to face/beat HBK (again).
At least last year Brock had a tremendous power game people could get behind, this year Sting brought nothing to the table Liger hasn't seen before, done better, overpowered, or beaten outright. Ah well, time to look to next year.