no, my timeline of the Bret Hart situation is spot on. Bret Hart left WWE after Wrestlemania 12 when his contract expired. He was in a bidding war between WCW and WWE for most of 1996, finally re-signing a 20 year contract with WWE in October 1996, well after the nWo angle had happened and was in motion. Whilst in negotiations with WCW IN 1996, Hart was sounded out, as was Bulldog about joining WCW in this angle. Both knocked it back, and Hart kept both sides guessing until he re-signed with WWE. It was in October 1997, one year in to his new 20 year contract that Bret and Vince had their dramas aboput not beinmg able to honour Brets contract and Vince advised Bret to see if he could get the original deal WCW had offered in 1996. Bret got the $9 million, three year deal and Vince released Bret from his contract. Montreal followed after Bret refused to drop the belt at Survivor Series 1997. Timeline is spot on my friend. The Montreal Screwjob would have not ever happened if Bret signed in 1996 with WCW. FACT
Then your reading skills are off. Your last statement "The Montreal Screwjob would have not ever happened if Bret signed in 1996 with WCW. FACT" is not only poorly written, it doesn't address my post. Yes, that is a fact; but, that goes without saying--which is fitting because I didn't say anything to the contrary. What I said was that Hart joining the NWO after being screwed would not have been effective. However, him joining, or being the 3rd man, would have made sense. Again, not nearly as effective as Hogan, but it would have made sense and worked.
Thank you for recapping the Bret Hart autobiography for me; but, that was not a valid response to my statement. Maybe instead of memorization of facts and dates, you could apply some reasoning skills to your thought process.
And, I know I mentioned it already, but your last statement is so out of place and unnecessary--and such a "duh"--that I find it hard to believe you find yourself to be smarter than everyone else on this board, yet can't read comments for what they are. It's like you saying the world is round, not flat and me responding with "Columbus was Italian. FACT" Yes, that is a fact, but has no bearing on the original statement.
I shouldn't be surprised. I just wish there was a forum for people who know how to read and a separate one for people like you.
To those who actually did read--and understand--my post. My opinion is that Bret would have been effective, but not as effective as the legendary Hogan turn. The screwjob (EVERYONE knows it happened in November 1997) but had it happened pre-Bash at the Beach or whenever, it would not have worked as a lead in. The timing of the screwjob is not the point. It is the story of the screwjob. Had Bret been screwed and THEN shown up as the third man, or some other addition to the boys from the north "taking over", it would have been seen through and been ineffective. That is why 1996 Bret, albeit to a much smaller degree to Hogan, would have worked.
1+1=2 FACT