I for one as well, do miss the Attitude era. I read through multiple posts condemning the era and all I kept seeing was "there was too much blood. There was too much ass. Someone gave birth to a hand." Yeah, there was that whole hand thing, but in the end that entire angle wasn't about being serious, it was about being ridiculous. And perhaps a hand was the best thing they could come up with. It wasn't meant to be a good angle, it wasn't meant to be a classic. You would have rather had Mark Henry's kid come out of that old bag? Really? Or maybe Funaki's? No...the angle was meant to make you laugh or better yet scream out "What the hell is that?" And it succeeded at that at the time.
But, on the other end of that, there were also the TLC matches, the First few Hell in a Cells, the death of kayfabe, the feuds between The Rock and Austin that no one in this "era" will ever be able to match, Pre-Jesus DX vs. Everyone. Hell, look at Floyd Mayweather. How much attention did he garner for Wrestlemania last year? Not too much. How much did Tyson pick up during the Attitude era? How much more was wrestling talked about in the mainstream media than it is now? That's why the ratings are down and declining. Because unless it's bad news, the mainstream media isn't talking about wrestling. Why? Because it isn't edgy anymore, there's no heat on it. The people that are left now are the actual wrestling fans. I had been watching since before the Attitude era began, but when it ramped up, it felt new, it felt fresh, it felt like something I should feel dirty for watching. And maybe that's why I watched it and maybe that's why I miss it. Unlike the Wu-Tang Clan, professional wrestling was never for "the children." It was an adult venture that Vince McMahon turned into something that could be watched by the whole family. Before the 80s wrestling took place in dirty bars, in dingy, dark moose lodges, tiny convention centers, and other seedy joints that wouldn't allow kids in even if you brought them. The women, with few exceptions, were there for eye candy and nothing more. They stood at ringside in tight clothes and flirted with the fans. Occasionally, there would be a catfight or a mud wrestling match. The wrestlers were large, burly, legit tough guys who would ride to the next town and run another match, in another dirty, grimy wrestling venue, often in the same day. It was edgy, it was raw, it felt violent. This is what wrestling was. It's no longer what it is. Vince changed the game, changed it back, and is now changing it back again.
But now, it all feels stale. This push for a PG rating at 9 o'clock at night seems a bit ridiculous, especially since people a bit younger than me who might have started watching wrestling during the Attitude era are older and are probably bored with it. It's like buying a rap album at Wal-Mart: it just ain't the same. When Ric Flair got his eyebrow busted open by Jericho, it was the first bit of blood I had seen in a long time on a WWE show. I was honestly surprised that they didn't cut it to black and white when he started bleeding (which, by the way, wasn't a typical Ric bleed, because Ric didn't blade.) You look at the old timers, the legends, the "Hall of Famers." The ones who were the biggest names all have scars lining their foreheads from where they bladed the same places over and over, night after night. It's long been a part of the business. One of the matches that I still hold in my top three (Austin/Hart WM 13) is there because of the blood. It made the match more intense, more powerful, more urgent. You're not going to get those kinds of matches today. Partially because of talent level but also because the wrestlers are being limited by the PG rating.
Yes, I realize that the Attitude era is gone. I also understand that every generation says to the next one to come along "You know in my day, shit was better" I understand that me and all of my friends who agree with me are taking that posture. It doesn't mean I didn't like what happened on Mon's Raw, and it doesn't mean I'm going to stop watching. In fact I love the Trips/Orton angle. Yeah it's been done before but this feels fresh, it' different than all this other PG shit because in what PG world of the prayers and vitamins does a wrestler assault another wrestler's wife right in front of him, daughter of the company owner or not?
But I watched before Attitude and I watch after Attitude. I also understand that this business is cyclical and is an amalgam of everything else in the world. The country was irreverent, frustrated, and horny in the 90s. This was the wrestling business as well. Once the country gets over it's feel good moments and hope and gets back to the reality of what it is to be human, and we start to see anger, backlash, and general frustration welling up within people, I'm sure we'll get a little more Attitude in our product.
So everyone that says "This is so much better than Attitude era" please do realize that you are not watching wrestling. You're watching sports entertainment. Any last glimmer of professional wrestling in the WWE died with the Attitude era. Now all you're left with is what Vince McMahon thinks pro wrestling should be.