Dean Ambrose vs Seth Rollins

[STAR PLATINUM $9.99]

I have been thinking about how Dean vs Seth story should end. I think they should finish the feud off either at Hell in a cell or TLC.

With Hell in a cell both guys could have a brutal cell match, and Dean would be able to finally get the win over Rollins, sense Rollins cant escape.

With TLC they could do a TLC match for the Money in the bank, though i dont think it would make sense for them to take it off of Seth.

They could also then start the feud back up again once Reigns wins the title, and have a three way.

How should they end this feud?

 

[Mudlup50]

I've always been a fan of ending it at TLC, technically a TLC is just a no DQ match right? It's a ladder match with the belt/contract/briefcase is above the ring. So it wouldn't have to be on the line. Plus in theory you'd want Rollins to win the feud, Dean can snap and target the Authority giving him a match against Trips or Orton at Mania to help him big time too.

 

[Wolf Pac]

I would be alright with them ending their feud at TLC instead of Hell in a Cell, assuming they're not in a Hell in a Cell match. I love the thought of those two captaining/leading teams against each other at Survivor Series, if they get to continue their feud past Hell in a Cell. I'd be cool with them in a Ladder match for the briefcase, the idea of it reminds me of Rock vs. Triple H at Summerslam 98, two solid future main eventers battling it out in a feud-ending Ladder match, but a Ladder match would it make too obvious that Rollins would win. I think I'd go with a Chairs match instead since this all started with Rollins whacking both Ambrose and Reigns with a chair. Plus The Shield made their in-ring debut at TLC two years ago, so it would be kinda fitting to end it between the two there.

 

[Jack-Hammer]

Depending upon when exactly they're bringing Ambrose back to television, I'd probably end it at Survivor Series if he pops back up in time to make his presence felt at Night of Champions. I could see the title situation at NOC go down like this:

I'm thinking that Cena vs. Lesnar at NOC will be more of the equal, back & forth brawl we were expecting at SummerSlam. As a result, no matter who wins, the winner will be exhausted. Rollins could attempt to cash in and come within a hair of doing so, only for Dean Ambrose to pop up out of nowhere and screw Rollins out of yet another opportunity. It'd seem sort of poetic really and would immediately restore heat to the feud since Rollins waited all this time, had the perfect opportunity and Ambrose suddenly shows up to spoil his plans yet again.

This leads to the feud picking back up with the two of them ultimately meeting at Hell in a Cell in which Ambrose is ultimately able to pick up his first win over Rollins. In order to even things up at 2-2, I could see them having a final match at Survivor Series IF WWE doesn't go the route of including them in a traditional Survivor Series 10 man elimination tag team bout. For the heels, I could see the team consisting of Triple H, Kane, Randy Orton, Seth Rollins and POSSIBLY Cesaro or Miz. If Triple H doesn't compete, I could see both Cesaro & Miz being put on the heel team. The babyfaces could be made up of John Cena, Roman Reigns, Dean Ambrose, Sheamus and Dolph Ziggler.

Of course, as I said, it all depends upon when Dean Ambrose finishes filming his scenes for the movie he'll be starring in. If not in time to make his presence felt at NOC, he could still pop up sometime before Hell in a Cell or possibly in time for Survivor Series, which could lead into TLC. If it does extend to and end at TLC, I personally hope it's not for Rollins' MITB briefcase. While it'd be an entertaining match, it's also one of those situations where logic suffers a brain fart because Ambrose would have everything to gain and nothing at all to lose. All Ambrose could put on the line would be his career, which makes it even worse because it telegraphs the ending of the match the very instant said stipulation is named.

 

[Mudlup50]

Depending upon when exactly they're bringing Ambrose back to television, I'd probably end it at Survivor Series if he pops back up in time to make his presence felt at Night of Champions. I could see the title situation at NOC go down like this:

I'm thinking that Cena vs. Lesnar at NOC will be more of the equal, back & forth brawl we were expecting at SummerSlam. As a result, no matter who wins, the winner will be exhausted. Rollins could attempt to cash in and come within a hair of doing so, only for Dean Ambrose to pop up out of nowhere and screw Rollins out of yet another opportunity. It'd seem sort of poetic really and would immediately restore heat to the feud since Rollins waited all this time, had the perfect opportunity and Ambrose suddenly shows up to spoil his plans yet again.

This leads to the feud picking back up with the two of them ultimately meeting at Hell in a Cell in which Ambrose is ultimately able to pick up his first win over Rollins. In order to even things up at 2-2, I could see them having a final match at Survivor Series IF WWE doesn't go the route of including them in a traditional Survivor Series 10 man elimination tag team bout. For the heels, I could see the team consisting of Triple H, Kane, Randy Orton, Seth Rollins and POSSIBLY Cesaro or Miz. If Triple H doesn't compete, I could see both Cesaro & Miz being put on the heel team. The babyfaces could be made up of John Cena, Roman Reigns, Dean Ambrose, Sheamus and Dolph Ziggler.

Of course, as I said, it all depends upon when Dean Ambrose finishes filming his scenes for the movie he'll be starring in. If not in time to make his presence felt at NOC, he could still pop up sometime before Hell in a Cell or possibly in time for Survivor Series, which could lead into TLC. If it does extend to and end at TLC, I personally hope it's not for Rollins' MITB briefcase. While it'd be an entertaining match, it's also one of those situations where logic suffers a brain fart because Ambrose would have everything to gain and nothing at all to lose. All Ambrose could put on the line would be his career, which makes it even worse because it telegraphs the ending of the match the very instant said stipulation is named.

I like this idea, it also gives Lesnar a reason to turn on the Authority which currently seems like a problem. I mean why does Trips want the title off of Lesnar when now they're fine. Imagine Rollins coming out and almost winning it to have Ambrose legitimately cost him his opportunity.
Authority is madder at Ambrose.
Lesnar is mad at the Authority for turning on him.
Rollins is madder at Ambrose.

I think that works out perfectly

 

[Wrestlingaholic]

'Finish' it at Hell in a Cell inside the cell - though have it as one of those Martel/Santana or Michaels/Jannetty feuds which never truly ends and flares up again in Royal Rumbles etc...

At TLC Rollins can face Reigns in a chairs match

 

[Mustang Sally]

I love the thought of those two captaining/leading teams against each other at Survivor Series, if they get to continue their feud past Hell in a Cell.

I can see that too, with the main idea being that there should be no definitive end to their feud. People are talking about putting them in Hell in a Cell, yet those type of matches are generally reserved for main eventers, which Rollins and Ambrose are not. Also, a HIAC usually signifies that a feud is about to end, and as I said, it's not a good idea to end this one with a clear winner and loser. As mid-carders (with favored status, at present) these guys are shooting for top-of-the-card status.... and saddling one with a clean loss to another mid-carder (i.e. each other) at this point sends the loser back to square one.

So, this begs the question: What is the long-range plan for Dean Ambrose and Seth Rollins? Are they both penciled in as main event performers in the near future? Distant future? Is only one of them being primed for this status? If so, which one?

If both are slated for runs at the top, there might not be a definitive end to the feud, at least in the foreseeable future. Personally, I think Seth Rollins might be headed for the top, based largely on the company he's been keeping. Ambrose is a loner; I don't see him fighting for main event status anytime soon due to his "kamikaze" type moves and ludicrous contorted facial expressions, which make me think of a third-grade bully having a tantrum in the playground.

But in reference to the above quote, having each guy lead teams at Survivor Series is exactly the kind of stuff it would be productive for them to do while management is deciding which one (if not both) have a bright future with the company.

 

[MCMG]

I'd be happy with this ending at Hell in a Cell. This has been a great feud and I'm sure they could wrestle each other for months and make it entertaining but this would be a logical end to this chapter. I don't even care who wins because both options have possibilities. Either way, a match inside the cell would be awesome and should be brutal.

In the long run, I'd like a match between the two at Wrestlemania 31. These two (plus Reigns) could build a really interesting story between them for years to come that gives us some classics at the biggest show of the year. Dean finally defeating Rollins at Mania would be fantastic and give us closure for a good while.

 

[Aeon Mathix]

This can easily go to the Cell which is should end at. I have been pulling for it to end in the Cell all summer long. To say that Dean vs Seth isn't Hell in a Cell worthy is ludicrous. If Triple H and Shawn Michaels vs Legacy can go to a Cell match this certainly can. It has that bitter hatred that rivalries have been lacking where the audience wants them to just destroy each other and for Dean to get his revenge.

It shouldn't continue past the Cell. I know Hell in a Cell has become a pit stop in a feud for the last several years save for Triple H vs Undertaker at Wrestlemania 28 rather than a way for a feud to end, but depending on how Rollins vs Ambrose goes, there will be no need for it to continue. If we want closure, look no further than the Cell. Ambrose picks up his win akin to Triple H beating Austin in their 2 out of 3 falls match where no guy really lost. It keeps both looking strong and Ambrose can be satisfied and they both move on to something else.

Then a few years down the road they can find a common enemy along with Reigns and we can hear Sierra Hotel India Echo Lima Delta again...

 

[STAR PLATINUM $9.99]

It shouldn't continue past the Cell. I know Hell in a Cell has become a pit stop in a feud for the last several years save for Triple H vs Undertaker at Wrestlemania 28 rather than a way for a feud to end, but depending on how Rollins vs Ambrose goes, there will be no need for it to continue. If we want closure, look no further than the Cell. Ambrose picks up his win akin to Triple H beating Austin in their 2 out of 3 falls match where no guy really lost. It keeps both looking strong and Ambrose can be satisfied and they both move on to something else.

Then a few years down the road they can find a common enemy along with Reigns and we can hear Sierra Hotel India Echo Lima Delta again...

I like this idea a lot, and this is what i had in mind when i was thinking that it should end at heel in a cell. kinda like how Austin vs HHH, or even undertaker vs mankind, were both feuds ended.

 

[kadroan]

I'd end it at Hell In A Cell. The feud has been going long enough already. They both need to move on to bigger and better things.

Rollins could feud for the IC title to elevate the Championship and win his first solo championship since the main event scene is crowded.

Ambrose could feud with Kane/Orton and maybe get a match with HHH at WrestleMania

 

[Dagger Dias]

The end needs to be in an extremely intense gimmick match. Hell In A Cell doesn't feel like the right place to end this feud. It is typically one of the weaker shows of the year. Plus there's the fact that Dean and Seth are good enough to keep me wanting to see more. They have showed us in this feud why they should be the future of the company. I'd argue it's one of the best feuds since Michaels VS Jericho. Much like that feud, which lasted for several months, I wouldn't mind seeing this one keep going for a long time. Three PPV's is usually more than enough for a feud in today's WWE but this is one of the few exceptions.

If WWE can keep it going long enough, the best place to end it would be at TLC. They could put Dean and Seth into a TLC match there. Or better yet, since the World Heavyweight Championship will probably receive that gimmick match type (this of course is assuming neither Dean or Seth are wrestling for the world title) then they could always do something a little different to end this is an epic way. Three Stages Of Hell Match at TLC. First stage is a Chairs match, second is a Tables match, third is a Ladder match. Seth could get forced to put his briefcase on the line if he still has it, or the winner could get a World Heavyweight Championship match at the Royal Rumble or one of the upcoming Raw's. It makes sense even if Seth still has the briefcase as it gives him a huge advantage over the defending champion, he could wrestle two world title matches that same night if he cashed in. Dean Ambrose should then win the feud ultimately in the end. I couldn't think of a better way to end the feud and as good as it's been, I'd want to see it last the rest of the year.

 

[Sheamus' Suntan]

Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you a little known case, of a rivalry that I love to dub as the DX rivalry.

HHH and HBK portrayed friends and rivals right the way through their careers. Some times they were the best of buddies, others they hated one another. I now ask you. Why the hell does this rivalry ever truly have to end?

The words from Ambrose: "Every time you go to cash that briefcase in, I will be there." (Paraphrased of course.)

Ambrose should never let Rollins cash in. He should haunt him right the way up until MITB next year. And its easy enough to do with keeping interest; you don't build ambrose vs Rollins every damned week.

You let Rollins have a fresh feud. You can give him whomever you like quite frankly. You give ambrose/Orton a stab. You don't have Rollins attempt to cash in (he won't against lesnar anyway. Why would you, if you're built like Rollins, even try to anger Brock Lesnar?)

This gives you until Wrestlemania (my bet on when Lesnar loses the title.) Now you have yourself a great chance. Lesnar has a rematch at extreme rules, possibly as a triple threat with Cena involved. Reigns retains. We're now all but a couple of months away from MITB.

Ambrose enters and wins the new money in the bank contract in the same night as Rollins cashes in to win the WWE WHC. There we have it. A shield triple threat main event set in stone.

To me, that makes more sense than the Rollins even attempting a cash in on Lesnar. It sets a new record with Rollins holding onto the briefcase for the longest period of time. Ambrose would be too exhausted to stop Rollins cash in. The storyline continues, and in fact over the years I see ambrose and Rollins teaming up and falling out...throughout their careers in WWE.