This week Roman Reigns won Superstar of the Year at the Slammys and quite a lot of people reacted with disgust. Here was extra proof that Reigns is being rammed down our throat as the next main man no matter what we want, the polar opposite to Daniel Bryan basically. This isn't the first misstep with Roman Reigns this year and it isn't the first time we've seen fans begin to turn on Reigns. At Summerslam there was a very sizeable chunk of the audience that were behind Orton in their match.
But what if this is a set up for something different? The past two years the Authority storyline has been hammering home to us that the company likes A+, big sized wrestlers and don't see the likes of Bryan or Ziggler as their choices. The rise of Daniel Bryan to the title was based along the lines of the fans and Bryan joining together to overcome the WWE boardroom, whilst similar ideas have been used in recent years to help get CM Punk and Dolph Ziggler over. So why then is the company pushing Reigns so obviously as their guy?
Most things I could excuse as just missteps in his character development but winning Superstar of the Year was the first time I've thought there might be a reason behind this. It just seemed to scream This Is Vince's Guy a bit too obviously and in an era where the company accepts that smarks are everywhere it just seemed like a bit of a slap on the face to them. Leaks from the back for months have fed us the story that Roman Reigns is winning the Royal Rumble and winning the title at Wrestlemania and nothing is changing that. I don't think it's a crazy idea to suggest that if that is the straight up idea that Reigns could get booed out of the building at Mania and it could genuinely derail his babyface momentum right from the off. Vince and Triple H have to know this too, they saw it happen to Batista last year and had to change their main event even.
The main event heels are also thin on the ground right now. Lesnar is part time and Rollins can't carry the can for ever. Bray Wyatt needs some upper midcard feuds and wins to help him get back to his pre-Cena feud ways and guys like Kane and Big Show are just too stale. Rusev is there but it does feel he is just being built up to lose to Cena at Mania and the question has to be what happens to him afterwards?
So what if Reigns is the guy to be the next number one heel and not number one babyface? Him as the company's pick fighting Ambrose, Bryan and Cena could lead to a lot more money than him taking on Big Show, Kane and Wyatt. I mean WWE already has Bryan and Cena on the face side, they don't really need a third top line babyface, particularly one the audience might not even allow be one
But what if this is a set up for something different? The past two years the Authority storyline has been hammering home to us that the company likes A+, big sized wrestlers and don't see the likes of Bryan or Ziggler as their choices. The rise of Daniel Bryan to the title was based along the lines of the fans and Bryan joining together to overcome the WWE boardroom, whilst similar ideas have been used in recent years to help get CM Punk and Dolph Ziggler over. So why then is the company pushing Reigns so obviously as their guy?
Most things I could excuse as just missteps in his character development but winning Superstar of the Year was the first time I've thought there might be a reason behind this. It just seemed to scream This Is Vince's Guy a bit too obviously and in an era where the company accepts that smarks are everywhere it just seemed like a bit of a slap on the face to them. Leaks from the back for months have fed us the story that Roman Reigns is winning the Royal Rumble and winning the title at Wrestlemania and nothing is changing that. I don't think it's a crazy idea to suggest that if that is the straight up idea that Reigns could get booed out of the building at Mania and it could genuinely derail his babyface momentum right from the off. Vince and Triple H have to know this too, they saw it happen to Batista last year and had to change their main event even.
The main event heels are also thin on the ground right now. Lesnar is part time and Rollins can't carry the can for ever. Bray Wyatt needs some upper midcard feuds and wins to help him get back to his pre-Cena feud ways and guys like Kane and Big Show are just too stale. Rusev is there but it does feel he is just being built up to lose to Cena at Mania and the question has to be what happens to him afterwards?
So what if Reigns is the guy to be the next number one heel and not number one babyface? Him as the company's pick fighting Ambrose, Bryan and Cena could lead to a lot more money than him taking on Big Show, Kane and Wyatt. I mean WWE already has Bryan and Cena on the face side, they don't really need a third top line babyface, particularly one the audience might not even allow be one