CM Punk: NOT better than John Cena
- Thread starter Coco
- Start date
Agreed. I swear, sometimes those guys are too fucking touchy about stuff. And Punk's championship feuds were the most refreshing things on WWE television for a while, considering that he's still considered 'new talent' or 'new blood.' Now what do we have to look forward to... oh, that's right... ANOTHER Batista vs. Taker feud. Gee, haven't seen that one before.
While we're at it, let's move Matt Hardy again. He's stale.
Seriously... grow some thick fucking skin, for God's sake.
I think I speak for all of us when I say that my comments stand IF these rumors are true. If they wanted to take the title off Punk just because, well, they wanted to take the title off Punk then so be it.
I don't see where the hissy fit is for him getting heat. He works for a company, they say what goes. If he doesn't like it he should go into business for himself. He is no where near the star John Cena is, nor did they mention John Cena when they approached him. WWE is a huge corporation. Do you know how the corporate structure works? I mean on a high level? It wasn't so much that he mentioned Cena's name, its that they approached him and he brought someone else into the equation. Why mention another worker when your boss is talking to you? Do you think these people are friends first then business partners 2nd? Get your minds right, this is a business, and what the heads of the company say goes. Plus a house hold name and legend like Taker comes up to you and tells you something, you listen. End of discussion.
Gee, remember the thread I started a couple of weeks back about how "CM Punk Ain't That Good". I feel a little vindicated right now because everyone was so high on the guy as if he is the messiah of the WWE and the cornerstone of the future. The guy is a glorified mid carder who is easily replaceable. As you can see WWE has no problem taking everything away from him for something so petty as attire. He was squashed by Taker like he should have been, that's a part of paying your dues. Now go feud with Morrison over the IC title where you belong.
Gee, remember the thread I started a couple of weeks back about how "CM Punk Ain't That Good". I feel a little vindicated right now because everyone was so high on the guy as if he is the messiah of the WWE and the cornerstone of the future. The guy is a glorified mid carder who is easily replaceable. As you can see WWE has no problem taking everything away from him for something so petty as attire. He was squashed by Taker like he should have been, that's a part of paying your dues. Now go feud with Morrison over the IC title where you belong.
I was not aware that the Taker signed C.M. Punks checks.
shooter_mcgavin
Mid-Card Championship Winner
This is just so .... F***ed up. I mean CM Punk just said "what about John Cena?" its a very valid argument, its not like he was saying anything insulting.
Further proof the WWE is so backwards when it comes to running and managing its employees. I myself work for a large corporation and what I have learned is that good upper managment and leadership means treat their employees well and allowing them to voice out their concerns. It just seems that in the WWE if you speak out and not a top star you are in trouble. These days most companies and most books about management professes the environment when employees should be empowered to voice out their concerns.
Ok CM Punk wasnt constructive but he pretty much gave an analogy that makes sense. The argument was that Punk is not a bigger star than Cena rather Punk and Cena are both world champions.
Oh regarding the spoiler of Undertaker's new challenger ... my reaction is "well there goes Smackdown! being the top brand", it was fun while it lasted.
Further proof the WWE is so backwards when it comes to running and managing its employees. I myself work for a large corporation and what I have learned is that good upper managment and leadership means treat their employees well and allowing them to voice out their concerns. It just seems that in the WWE if you speak out and not a top star you are in trouble. These days most companies and most books about management professes the environment when employees should be empowered to voice out their concerns.
Ok CM Punk wasnt constructive but he pretty much gave an analogy that makes sense. The argument was that Punk is not a bigger star than Cena rather Punk and Cena are both world champions.
Oh regarding the spoiler of Undertaker's new challenger ... my reaction is "well there goes Smackdown! being the top brand", it was fun while it lasted.
Ok, so what you're saying is that the next time I don't agree with my boss I should say "FUCK YOU" because it's an analogy for "I don't agree with you"? Punk was insubordinate to a locker room leader and aired out dirty laundry in public when he should've spoken to Taker in private if he had an issue. However minor, Punk's actions were disrespectful towards a veteran and an obvious leader of the business that you don't ask questions to when they tell you to do something.
Like I said before, we're blowing this out of proportion. Punk's career is not over by any means. He's being tested. Now, he just needs to dust himself off and continue moving forward. He'll be fine, everyone.
