I agree with the fact that chavo shouldnt of been in the rumble, but i disagree with the fact that the wwe doesnt care about the ecw belt, i feel that it may have been an error in judgement on there part
Will does snitsky deserve a spot coz to me i think that anyone deserving could have taken the spot including kofi kingston, stevie richards, brian kendrick, anyone from smackdown, i do not however believe that chavo should of been there at all, he could of continued his feud with punk just by mere distraction alone
The Royal Rumble line-up was as follows. From order of entry..
Undertaker, Shawn Michaels,
Santino Marella, The Great Khali, Hardcore Holly, John Morrison, Tommy Dreamer, Batista,
Hornswoggle,
Chuck Palumbo,
Jamie Noble, C.M. Punk,
Cody Rhodes, Umaga, Snitsky,
The Miz, Shelton Benjamin,
Superfly Jimmy Snuka,
Rowdy Roddy Piper, Kane, Carlito, Mick Foley, Mr. Kennedy, Big Daddy V, Mark Henry, Chavo Guerrero, Finlay, Elijah Burke, Triple H. and John Cena.
The bolded names are those who honestly DO NOT deserve a World Heavyweight Championship match.. until they work more for it.
Those that have underlines under their names are purely gimmick, and only a filler.
To me, Snitsky doesn't deserve a World Championship to wear, but he does deserve a shot at the title.. if only so his gimmick can get more over. They want to build him, like Mark Henry & Big V.. to be monsters. Snitsky could slightly be similar to Umaga.. a destructive force.
The fact is, Charlie Haas, Kofi Kingston, or anyone else you named could've and should've had the spot over Hornswoggle, Piper & Snuka.. because out of those three, Hornswoggle had the greatest chance for a fluke upset.. and had they of actually done that, they would've completely ruined the legacy of the Royal Rumble by treating it as a joke.
But to say Snitsky didn't deserve to be in the Rumble, yet guys like Snuka, Piper, or Hornswoggle did.. is basically disrespecting Snitsky as a whole.. and while he isn't anywhere near great, and barely reaches good.. he's not horrible.