I Suck Ass
I survived the Rapture
This is for the people who are constantly saying Cena needs to be a heel. Well, he doesn't. It's pretty simple. If you ask someone that has never watch a wrestling show in their life to name one wrestler, they'll say 1 of 4 names: Hogan, Rock, Stone Cold, or Cena. That's how big he is. Why would you take your biggest moneymaker and your role model for kids and turn him heel? Both in wrestling and in business, it wouldn't make sense.
Let's look at wrestling. I've heard 2 suggestions, 1 bad, 1 mediocre. The bad one is "Cena vs. Taker at WM27". NO NO NO NO NO!!! Taker vs. Cena wouldn't be great and it would take a lot of time and effort to get there. Taker would have to win the title from Kane and eliminate him by TLC. Cena would have to eliminate Nexus and get into an in-between title feud, like Cena vs. Miz, and then he would have to win the Royal Rumble. Someone younger that needs the push will win the Rumble, and the way it looks now, Taker won't be getting the title. The mediocre one was to have Cena lose to Barrett. This is the thread, so I won't elaborate. http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=133119 Basically, it says that Cena can lose and then it would test the waters of heel Cena. But why have Cena lose? Nexus is coming to it's end, and to have Cena lose at HIAC would make no sense.
Now let's look at it from a business standpoint. Cena is one of, if not the top seller in WWE, both to kids and adults. In a way, he even sells heel merchandise, because the Cena-haters buy up the shirt of whoever Cena is going against. Why would you get rid of that? It would lose thousands of dollars. There is no sense in it from a business standpoint.
I will conclude with this. Cena has the look and skills of a face. And please don't say "Cena sucks", "Cena only knows 5 moves", or anything like that. I just wanted to prove to the people that say that Cena should turn heel how stupid of an idea it is.
Let's look at wrestling. I've heard 2 suggestions, 1 bad, 1 mediocre. The bad one is "Cena vs. Taker at WM27". NO NO NO NO NO!!! Taker vs. Cena wouldn't be great and it would take a lot of time and effort to get there. Taker would have to win the title from Kane and eliminate him by TLC. Cena would have to eliminate Nexus and get into an in-between title feud, like Cena vs. Miz, and then he would have to win the Royal Rumble. Someone younger that needs the push will win the Rumble, and the way it looks now, Taker won't be getting the title. The mediocre one was to have Cena lose to Barrett. This is the thread, so I won't elaborate. http://forums.wrestlezone.com/showthread.php?t=133119 Basically, it says that Cena can lose and then it would test the waters of heel Cena. But why have Cena lose? Nexus is coming to it's end, and to have Cena lose at HIAC would make no sense.
Now let's look at it from a business standpoint. Cena is one of, if not the top seller in WWE, both to kids and adults. In a way, he even sells heel merchandise, because the Cena-haters buy up the shirt of whoever Cena is going against. Why would you get rid of that? It would lose thousands of dollars. There is no sense in it from a business standpoint.
I will conclude with this. Cena has the look and skills of a face. And please don't say "Cena sucks", "Cena only knows 5 moves", or anything like that. I just wanted to prove to the people that say that Cena should turn heel how stupid of an idea it is.