People like to say politics and sport shouldnt mix, but they do, no argument about it. In many cases sport is seen as more important than politics. The most political of things is war. Can sport be used more to cut down on violence and help some countries find their way in the world?
During World War I there were a number of recorded instances where troops left the trenches and had a kickabout with the enemy, before returning to fight the war again.
More recently you have cases where the country of Sri Lanka stops its bitter civil war to watch the nations cricket matches, where South Korea and Japan join forces to host a World Cup (an event which saw a Japanese Emperor on Korean soil for the first time in half a century) and India play Pakistan at cricket.
Sport also gives countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq a chance to give their country an image of more than a war torn country. Afghanistan were a whisker away from qualifying for the ICC Twenty20 World Cup and Iraq won the football (soccer) Asian Cup. This raised the spirits of the nation.
It gives countries who hate each other the chance to settle scores without the need for arms, such as the Olympics during the Cold War which pitted the USA against the Eastern Bloc or when Iran beat USA in the 1998 Football World Cup
Sport is not above violence, of course, with the 1972 Munich Olympic Games incident and the recent terrorist attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team, but can it be given a bigger role in promoting peace?
If North Korea and USA draw each other in the summers World Cup it would be a great chance for the two countries to show on a huge stage that they can be civil and have a tough, fair, sporting competition.
Should troubled countries be encouraged to compete in sport, and view that as a way to beat the enemy? Can somewhere like Somalia find an identity in any World Sport to promote peace? Should Zimbabwe be allowed to compete at cricket despite having Mugabe as a president?
Or does sport cause more problems than actual solutions between two "feuding" countries (boycotts/allegations of cheating etc)
Should sport not be as infuential as it is and stay aware from such political matters? Does it have a role at all?
During World War I there were a number of recorded instances where troops left the trenches and had a kickabout with the enemy, before returning to fight the war again.
More recently you have cases where the country of Sri Lanka stops its bitter civil war to watch the nations cricket matches, where South Korea and Japan join forces to host a World Cup (an event which saw a Japanese Emperor on Korean soil for the first time in half a century) and India play Pakistan at cricket.
Sport also gives countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq a chance to give their country an image of more than a war torn country. Afghanistan were a whisker away from qualifying for the ICC Twenty20 World Cup and Iraq won the football (soccer) Asian Cup. This raised the spirits of the nation.
It gives countries who hate each other the chance to settle scores without the need for arms, such as the Olympics during the Cold War which pitted the USA against the Eastern Bloc or when Iran beat USA in the 1998 Football World Cup
Sport is not above violence, of course, with the 1972 Munich Olympic Games incident and the recent terrorist attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team, but can it be given a bigger role in promoting peace?
If North Korea and USA draw each other in the summers World Cup it would be a great chance for the two countries to show on a huge stage that they can be civil and have a tough, fair, sporting competition.
Should troubled countries be encouraged to compete in sport, and view that as a way to beat the enemy? Can somewhere like Somalia find an identity in any World Sport to promote peace? Should Zimbabwe be allowed to compete at cricket despite having Mugabe as a president?
Or does sport cause more problems than actual solutions between two "feuding" countries (boycotts/allegations of cheating etc)
Should sport not be as infuential as it is and stay aware from such political matters? Does it have a role at all?