I dont recall saying the Steelers had a bad offensive game, did I? The Steelers were at their best during the game when they were running the ball. After running heavily in their third quarter drive when they went ahead 17-10,they stopped running the football. The offensive line was finally working as a cohesive unit, and Roethlisberger was missing open receivers. Yet, they continued to throw after Mendenhall was the first Steeler in 20 games to go over 100 yards against the Jets. Bad play calling, not a bad offensive output. It could, and should have been, more.
1. So you complain about the Steelers offense, in a game where they have a very good offensive game? That makes little sense.
2. Roethlisberger threw for over 250 yards. I'd say he threw the ball well.
3. Just cause Mendenhall had a good running game doesn't mean they should give him the ball 30 times. He got 100 yards, but if you give him 15 more carries, he could just as easily get to only 150 total, which would not be a good thing. They used the run, then tried to throw to catch the Jets off guard.
4. So the plays he called worked, but it's his fault. OK.
I get that. We're arguing semantics here. My point is they should have never run any type of running play, from the shotgun, out of their own end zone. That's TERRIBLE play calling. Do try and defend that, will ya?
They could have run the exact same play with Roethlisberger under center. It didn't matter. The problem was the O-Line not blocking Taylor. The playcall would have worked had the execution been at an NFL caliber, which it wasn't. Can't fault the coach, unless you just don't like the guy.
Moore was the absolute worst option to get out of the shadow of ones endzone. Redman, as you said, is the short yardage back you use to move the pile. What more could a team need then say, two yards to move the pile outside of the shadow of their own end zone? Mendenhall wasn't just dancing outside either, if you remember his TD run. There were several plays where he exploded up the middle.
Yeah, since the back didn't make a lick of difference, who cares who it was.
Because that play should never have been called.
Just because the play didn't work, doesn't mean it shouldn't have been called. The execution wasn't up to snuff, and the Jets player made a play.
As you said, he was there almost in time to take the handoff. The offensive line had no chance to block him because of the horrible design of the play.
No, he got in because the guy that was supposed to block him missed his assignment. when a guard pulls, the other linemen are supposed to block down to keep that guy from getting in untouched. They didn't.
Ive watched this team, including last year, fail to close out game after game because they inexplicably abandoned the run late in the game and threw the football. When you can't close down games on offense because you decide to chuck the ball all over the field rather then run the clock, the blame should go to he who calls the plays. That would be Bruce Arians.
The Steelers are one of, if not the, most dangerous team in the final 2 minutes. I'd say they close out games DAMN well. It took a good play by reserve corner Marquise Cole to keep the Steelers from winning yesterday (Spaeth might have made the catch had the corner not gotten a hand on it). And I'd say they threw the ball god damn well on that final drive. fucking hell, they got it to the 10, after numerous 3rds or 2nds and long.
As I said above, the offensive line had no chance to block Taylor on that play. The play was so poorly designed that it should have never been run. Thge offensive line had its best game of the season for not taking a holding penalty and keeping Ben upright for the majority of the game.
The play is a basic running play, it isn't poorly designed. The play was poorly EXECUTED. And Ben was far from kept upright. Multiple sacks, and multiple fumbles.
Id credit Sanchez more then Id blame the defense there. Helluva play.
I agree, but the guys on the offenses left NEEDS to defend against that, and since he isn't gonna be able to make a stop even if he jumps the handoff, he didn't do his job.
It wasn't a clear penalty. The hit wasn't helmet to helmet by any means. Should Clark have held up and not tried to hit him? He was out of the play, and made the only play he could. To suggest he'll be fined for that is ludicrous. Id expect more of ANOTHER apology letter from the league to the Steelers for the refs blowing yet another big call.
Helmet to Helmet isn't the issue. Launching is the issue. Launching at a receiver has been a penalty for a long time (not since this season). They aren't sending a letter. Maybe he doesn't get fined, but they damn sure aren't apologizing for a legit call.
Have fun. Taylor's had a heckuva career and is a local guy so I really like him. He made a great read and react, but the fact remains the play never should have been called.
Yeah, I proved it wasn't the call. And yes, I'm having fun a couple times when he makes plays (not as often as I'd like, but he's been solid, especially when Pace was hurt for the first 4 weeks).