LOLOL wow.
Anyway, how is everyone doing? Haven't been around this past week because of internet problems, hopefully that ends soon though.
Here's a question to get some discussion going: Do you think the main feuds HAVE to be for the title to make it important? We see WWE having the WWE Title take a backseat to whatever Cena does, so yeah, just a question I was wondering about.
No, if a feud is built up right regardless of the involvement of a title it can be important. Look at the feud between Shawn Michaels and Chris Jericho in 2008, they feuded without a title and it seemed important because of the great build.
So in my opinion it doesn't need to have a title to make it important. What do you think JAM?