BigT_HolyShit
The Machinist
Before you shoot this down and think, hey another 'steroid thread', its far from that. This is my first thread so bare with me.
I have been a long-time visitor of WrestleZone and this is an issue that really intrigues me. I, like alot of others here I'm sure, admire the ability for Wrestlers to perform predominantly the most part of their weeks and putting there bodies on the line day in, day out. In addition to this, the training these athletes endure to look the way they look. I myself would know, as I train 5 days a week and Bodybuilding is my life and I would like to think I know alot about it. If I'm not on here, I'm on a bodybuilding site reading. It's a 24 hour thing..
To the point, over the years, watching different performers and superstars and the evolution of their bodies over time has become another facet of my viewing. I'm assuming we all know that in the Wrestling Business, in order to train, diet and perform, there must be some sort of Enhancing drug involved. Whether it'd be for relieving pain, or simply for the added endurance.
Steroids and Bodybuilding go hand in hand. Fact. I will argue this thread to the end. I have competed in Natural Bodybuilding Competitions in Sydney for the under 90kg contest and know about the industry. Steroids are present in Natural Comps as well. The testing systems does not test for certain substances, or should I say certain substances are undetected under the test. Eg hGh Human Grown Hormone.
My question or interest is predominantly in the Wellness Policy the WWE has in place. I believe the policy is a loada shit and not reducing the occurence and use in the WWE in addition to protecting its superstars from ABUSE of these steroids which in term, leads to the side effects I'm sure you are all aware of. Yet on the contrary I sometimes think hang on, the examples of the Policy working is also present.
Some examples:
Yes Batista has used Steroids, No Shit. If you remember his Leviathan or Deacon Batista days, he was 4 times the size in comparison to now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlRnvga-6DM
He is much drier, holding less water retention and looks aesthetically more pleasing now due to the proportionality he has now. In my opinion, Batista isn't using or not using as much as before due to the Wellness Policy maybe? You may bring up his age and him not being able to hold as much muscle yet here's another example.
Randy Orton. You may think, he's not big enough to be using steroids? I know steroid use when I see it in addition to his name being on the list from that shady doc. The water retention is present and he was also double the size before as compared to his dry and lean viper look, which I think is much better. Could this be due to the Wellness Policy.
There are more examples, Kennedy, Regal, Santino (first capturing the Intercon. Title), Christian, Edge etc.
My question is this. There is no doubt steroid use is present in my opinion. Is the evolution of these superstars, from larger to slimmer or drier, due to the Wellness Policy or other reasons that you may bring up..
I have been a long-time visitor of WrestleZone and this is an issue that really intrigues me. I, like alot of others here I'm sure, admire the ability for Wrestlers to perform predominantly the most part of their weeks and putting there bodies on the line day in, day out. In addition to this, the training these athletes endure to look the way they look. I myself would know, as I train 5 days a week and Bodybuilding is my life and I would like to think I know alot about it. If I'm not on here, I'm on a bodybuilding site reading. It's a 24 hour thing..
To the point, over the years, watching different performers and superstars and the evolution of their bodies over time has become another facet of my viewing. I'm assuming we all know that in the Wrestling Business, in order to train, diet and perform, there must be some sort of Enhancing drug involved. Whether it'd be for relieving pain, or simply for the added endurance.
Steroids and Bodybuilding go hand in hand. Fact. I will argue this thread to the end. I have competed in Natural Bodybuilding Competitions in Sydney for the under 90kg contest and know about the industry. Steroids are present in Natural Comps as well. The testing systems does not test for certain substances, or should I say certain substances are undetected under the test. Eg hGh Human Grown Hormone.
My question or interest is predominantly in the Wellness Policy the WWE has in place. I believe the policy is a loada shit and not reducing the occurence and use in the WWE in addition to protecting its superstars from ABUSE of these steroids which in term, leads to the side effects I'm sure you are all aware of. Yet on the contrary I sometimes think hang on, the examples of the Policy working is also present.
Some examples:
Yes Batista has used Steroids, No Shit. If you remember his Leviathan or Deacon Batista days, he was 4 times the size in comparison to now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlRnvga-6DM
He is much drier, holding less water retention and looks aesthetically more pleasing now due to the proportionality he has now. In my opinion, Batista isn't using or not using as much as before due to the Wellness Policy maybe? You may bring up his age and him not being able to hold as much muscle yet here's another example.
Randy Orton. You may think, he's not big enough to be using steroids? I know steroid use when I see it in addition to his name being on the list from that shady doc. The water retention is present and he was also double the size before as compared to his dry and lean viper look, which I think is much better. Could this be due to the Wellness Policy.
There are more examples, Kennedy, Regal, Santino (first capturing the Intercon. Title), Christian, Edge etc.
My question is this. There is no doubt steroid use is present in my opinion. Is the evolution of these superstars, from larger to slimmer or drier, due to the Wellness Policy or other reasons that you may bring up..