When the Authority debuted it was HHH and Steph as leaders with Orton as their champion and the Shield as the back up/muscle/security for the Authority facing off against Bryan and this led to both good matches between Bryan and Orton as well as Bryan v members of Shield in either singles or tag matches.
Now however it is still HHH and Steph but with Rollins as the champ and Big Show, J&J and Kane back him up. Steph and HHH have been overused as they have been on Raw for atleast 30 minutes of every show for the last 18+ months. Rollins is an improvement on Orton as it is believable that the top executives would back him instead of Orton. The biggest issue comes when you try and compare Big Show, Kane and J&J to the Shield. The Shield are young, highly talented, dominant and over with the crowd. Big Show and Kane are old, slow, stale and crowd have no interest in seeing them, J&J are amusing and comical figures but the Face of the company shouldn't be backed up by a comical relief pair.
If the Authority angle is too continue WWE must go back to what made it successful and that was talented people from top to bottom in the group and therefore when they should look at replacing all but Rollins with a stable of talented younger guys and the trio I would pick is Owens, Corbin and Neville because Owens is a more powerful version of Ambrose, Corbin is like Reigns with explosiveness but still alot of greenness and Neville is the highflyer like Rollins. This way alot like the Shield did it would establish 3 of the top prospects at the top of the card and allow them to shine on the big stage against guys like Ambrose, Reigns, Orton and Cena. If your not sure about the idea, I'll ask a simple question, what would you prefer Reigns, Orton and Ambrose v Big Show, Kane and Rollins w/ J&J or Reigns, Orton and Ambrose v Corbin, Owens and Neville
Now however it is still HHH and Steph but with Rollins as the champ and Big Show, J&J and Kane back him up. Steph and HHH have been overused as they have been on Raw for atleast 30 minutes of every show for the last 18+ months. Rollins is an improvement on Orton as it is believable that the top executives would back him instead of Orton. The biggest issue comes when you try and compare Big Show, Kane and J&J to the Shield. The Shield are young, highly talented, dominant and over with the crowd. Big Show and Kane are old, slow, stale and crowd have no interest in seeing them, J&J are amusing and comical figures but the Face of the company shouldn't be backed up by a comical relief pair.
If the Authority angle is too continue WWE must go back to what made it successful and that was talented people from top to bottom in the group and therefore when they should look at replacing all but Rollins with a stable of talented younger guys and the trio I would pick is Owens, Corbin and Neville because Owens is a more powerful version of Ambrose, Corbin is like Reigns with explosiveness but still alot of greenness and Neville is the highflyer like Rollins. This way alot like the Shield did it would establish 3 of the top prospects at the top of the card and allow them to shine on the big stage against guys like Ambrose, Reigns, Orton and Cena. If your not sure about the idea, I'll ask a simple question, what would you prefer Reigns, Orton and Ambrose v Big Show, Kane and Rollins w/ J&J or Reigns, Orton and Ambrose v Corbin, Owens and Neville