Over the past 5 years, Dustin has averaged .307, and in the 3 full years he played and 2010 averaged 86 runs per game. Now, yes Dustin and Chase play the same positiion, but they are completely different players. Dustin bats 2nd for the Sox and Chase bats 3rd for Philadelphia, which gives Chase more RBI opportunities. Dustin has won an MVP, while leading his team to the World Series as the star. Chase on the other hand, has never won the MVP while two of his teammates have.
Now to me this plays a huge role in deciding my choice. Chase is a phenomenal player, and he has the ring, but he was never the star of the team, he was considered a great player and a key player for the team, but Dustin was the Red Sox that year and deserves the vote
1. Dustin Pedroia wasn't the "Star" of the 2007 Red Sox, he was a part of a team. Last time I checked, David Ortiz wasn't found out to be a steroid user, and Manny Ramirez was still batting behind Ortiz. They also had Lowell (who finished 5th in the MVP in 07 and won the World Series MVP). Also, Youkilis was on that team. So to say Pedroia was "The Star" on that team is ludicrous. He was one of many pieces, and to be honest, Manny, Papi, and Lowell were all more important, and I never even mentioned any of the Starting Pitchers or Papelbon. In 2008, at
worst Utley was the 3th biggest player on the team behind Rollins and Howard. Now he is definitely the 2nd, since Rollins has fallen off a little, and Utley has stepped up his game even more, if that was even possible.
2. Chase Utley has actually played in all 5 seasons that are used for this debate. In those 5 years, Utley finished in the top 10 in MVP voting 3 times, and top 15 all 5 times. Pedroia won the Rookie of the Year in 2007, MVP in 2008, and he was nothing in 2009. Pedroia didn't even get votes for the MVP award.
3. Comparing the statistics, I would rather have Utley's 5 consistent MVP-considering years, then Pedroia's 2 good years. during those years, Utley (as a 3 hitter) had comparable hits, batting average, and Batting Average. Also, Utley has better walks, Homers, RBI, Runs, On Base %, Slugging %, OPS, and pretty much everything else. Batting 2nd is supposed to give you more run-scoring opportunities over batting 3rd, yet Utley not only outscores Pedroia, but it isn't even close (111 to 81).
So I would rather have Utley, who has played in all 5 years, played better, and is trending upward, over Pedroia, who pretty much is a flash in the pan who had 1 great season, one solid year, and one ehh year. Chase Utley is the best 2nd baseman, and it isn't all that close.