Can someone PLEASE explain to me what's REALLY changed between TV-PG and PG-14?
The biggest 2 changes I've seen;
A WHOLE lot less blood and blading
A WHOLE lot less strong language.
Okay looking at this realistically.
Blood probably wasn't taken from product due to the TV rating. Being honest with you, for YEARS now on RAW and Smackdown, they've BLOCKED Blood on TV. They censor it and when a chair shot happens, they cut to the crowd. They've always pretty much been tight on it for rating purposes because excessive violence wouldn't even adhere to PG-14.
PPV's were always a bit different but HONESTLY are the health complications worth a bit of blood? McGuinness is in major trouble, health wise because of blading and blood. All it takes is one person with infection and that's it, a whole roster is in trouble if Blading is happening.
Also Blading caused notably big issues with continuity. A LOT of guys messed up. I remember seeing Orton in an Elimination Chamber match (05 maybe?) where he pulls a blade out AFTER he's launched into the chain and you can see the blade get stuck in the top of his head. The camera catches it perfectly. Honestly, it DOESN'T look good and it just causes health issues. Why do you NEED blood in a match to make it realistic? A lot of the time you're dropping someone onto their back. I can think of a few moves, DDT's mainly where you're attacking the face and even then, at the angles they're hit, you're rarely really going to get blood out of someone for it unless you hit it onto a sharp object.
Chair shots have become a whole lot more lethal LOOKING while being safer too. Gunna' bring up Orton here again. Anyone noticed his chair shots in the past couple of years? He sorta swipes with it instead of doing a full blown hit. This looks a lot better IMO than a straight shot and it does LESS DAMAGE.
Chair shots haven't been taken away completely, just to the skull. Which is fair enough, do we really want to risk more brain damage in this industry?
Blood is not neccessary. I hate people saying "it makes it more realistic" because it doesn't. At all. You can STILL have emotion in a match without it. Yes, it has added things in the past, but never really good things and now...lets say someone gets busted open at a PPV now, and it CAN happen due to legit injury, you know its legit and my God, the effect is amazing. It really adds something. Blood in every match...gets boring. Really boring.
As for profanity. Is it needed? No.
Why, honestly do people praise those who have built a career off of promos that basically JUST swore the entire time? Not taking away from Stone Cold here but come on...is it REALLY needed, every single time you step out there, to use profanity?
We can still have mild profanity in cases of TV-PG anyways.
I honestly don't see WHY the PG rating has caused WWE to be a worse product. Surely its just more a case of stale storylines, with no real stars yet to push the product further. All of the big guys have left, leaving no real names to work with and WWE are now trying to build that. Unfortunately it takes a long time. It won't be a year or two before we have big names, try five or six.
Is Batista really that sour because they've cut down on strong language and blood? I understand he left WWE because of this but being honest, going BACK to PG-14 is STILL going BACKWARDS. Wrestling should evolve and become fresh...not go back to what it was because it did well at the time. This is year 2011, not 2001. We don't have what we had before anymore...we don't have it because in this current climate it would fail. Miserably.