Why wouldn't the vast majority of Christians believe something that's printed in black-and-white in the Bible. Shattered said it best -- you can think of someone's entire lifestyle and identity as an abomination without hating them. That's what I mean when I say I was attacking Christianity.
We can argue Bible interpretation all day long, but I'm sure many people will agree that there are blatant anti-homosexual overtones throughout the Old Testament. Which absolutely has not been rendered obsolete by the New Testament, despite popular belief. I'm not going to speak for the churches who teach a different interpretation of the Bible than how I interpret it (like those that preach homosexuality is okay).
I would be absolutely cool with the Christian/Catholic church thinking of homosexuality itself as the sin, but being accepting of homosexuals in the community, and not using their status as a church to lobby against homosexual rights on a federal level. But that doesn't happen and you know it.
Look, I'm not one to go on Christian-bashing crusades. I don't hate Christians, or even Christianity itself. Catholicism is one of the most interesting and beautiful religions in the world (aesthetically, anyway, i.e. churches and stuff). But I'm just pointing out the fact that the scriptures are there, regardless of what the common Christian chooses to believe.
You can understand the Bible from back to front like an internet Harry Potter fan, but if you're going to deny that anti-homosexual overtones exist, then you're simply deluding yourself from seeing any negativity in your religion, and there's no reason to have this argument in the first place.
This all being said, I wouldn't have even started this thread if someone more intelligent took Ba-Bomb's place in that debate. This thread exists because he's an asshole.