Anti-Christ vs It Factor

[SacredMesa]

So since Hogan has come into the company we have had two big heel runs as TNA champion, the first was Jeff Hardy with his Anti-Christ of profesional wrestling persona and the second is of course now with Bobby Roode being the It Factor.

My questions are which character do you prefer more and why? Who do you think has done the best with the run given them, character wise excluding Hardy's drug issue? Also if Hardy hadn't had is drug issue last year do you think we would of ever even gotten Bobby Roode as we have him today?

 

[LegendKiller716]

I prefer Hardy's character. I thought it was some of his best work of his career. However, I hate how he was booked. He looked week. Immortal looked like a rag tag bunch of guys (because they were). I think his whole run was not thought out very well. Hogan and Bischoff wanted a "band-aid" effect. They wanted the Hogan Esq heel turn, but they didn't know what to do after it happened.

You can tell from that first year that Hogan, Bischoff, Flair, etc had never watched the promotion. They didn't get it, they didn't have a connection to any of the guys.

Bobby Roode's run is so much better because the guys in charge now have a feel for the company. They're starting to get a grasp of what direction they want to go. The title is gaining so much credibility being around the waist of Roode. The best part is, is that I know after the awesome build up of Roode is leading to a build up of James Storm.

In summary, I like Hardy's character more, but I think Roode's reign is better.

 

[dman1373]

i thought that he did a great job but either should have been by himself or surrounded by his own stable. It felt like they were trying to redo the nwo for the 100th time. And it didn't work. Plus hogan was stealing his spotlight the whole time.