Atrue1onewo1f
Dark Match Winner
Before I start...
I want to tell you about me...I am Mark Parham. I'm 25 I live in Iowa. I am a lifelong "Wrestling" Fan. I collect videos.... My Library is currently at 628 (not counting duplicates. As of January 15th I will be at 633. Not a mark, Just named Mark....LOL.
Now I watched WWF Invasion 2001 last night. The card was strong. But there was some things that did not set too well with me.
1) Michael Cole and J.R. on commentary.- while J.R. was good (... and still is to this day) and Cole was filling in for King. The commentary was outlandishly biased.
2) The constant mentioning of "The Old Stone Cold" and how he will "Lead" team WWF- It made Austin's betrayal predictable.
3) Undertaker....- His segment with vince could have had More impact on The "Inaugural Brawl"
If I could change these 3 things this is how I would do it
(in the order that is listed),
1) What I would do is have the leading commentators from all 3 brands (Tony Schiavone, Jim Ross, and Joey Styles. That way there is no complete burial of either company as as a result, all the participants in the matches look equally strong.
2) I would have focused on how Debra was abducted and how Austin wanted revenge....That way it would have never even lead you to believe Austin would sell out.
3) When Vince tried to motivate Undertaker, he was interrupted with a hand around the throat after reminding Him that DDP stalked his wife and released a "Best of Sarah" Compilation. I would have booked that as what makes Taker snap and join the aliance.
My question is this.... What do you think? and if there was anything you could correct about Invasion 2001 what would it be? How would you correct it?
I want to tell you about me...I am Mark Parham. I'm 25 I live in Iowa. I am a lifelong "Wrestling" Fan. I collect videos.... My Library is currently at 628 (not counting duplicates. As of January 15th I will be at 633. Not a mark, Just named Mark....LOL.
Now I watched WWF Invasion 2001 last night. The card was strong. But there was some things that did not set too well with me.
1) Michael Cole and J.R. on commentary.- while J.R. was good (... and still is to this day) and Cole was filling in for King. The commentary was outlandishly biased.
2) The constant mentioning of "The Old Stone Cold" and how he will "Lead" team WWF- It made Austin's betrayal predictable.
3) Undertaker....- His segment with vince could have had More impact on The "Inaugural Brawl"
If I could change these 3 things this is how I would do it
(in the order that is listed),
1) What I would do is have the leading commentators from all 3 brands (Tony Schiavone, Jim Ross, and Joey Styles. That way there is no complete burial of either company as as a result, all the participants in the matches look equally strong.
2) I would have focused on how Debra was abducted and how Austin wanted revenge....That way it would have never even lead you to believe Austin would sell out.
3) When Vince tried to motivate Undertaker, he was interrupted with a hand around the throat after reminding Him that DDP stalked his wife and released a "Best of Sarah" Compilation. I would have booked that as what makes Taker snap and join the aliance.
My question is this.... What do you think? and if there was anything you could correct about Invasion 2001 what would it be? How would you correct it?