the tv title is not a TNA creation like the X division championship. The television championship is historical and decades old going back to 1974. There is a well set out way to go about presenting and maintaining a TV title. Usually there was a 10 or 15 minute time limit. Most matches resulted in draws.
Obviously the reason for its induction was because Mid Atlantic had its own wrestling show in 1974. TNA has TWO. The TV title can be defended the same way the tv title was defended on Nitro or on ECW. The TV title can be defended on Xplosion the same way it was prominently showcased on WCW Saturday Night.. It can also be defended by Styles w/o it interfering with this invasion storyline. An up in comer or new arrival could chalendge for it in a regular match, lose, but still showcase his skills and maybe become friendly to Fortune.
The TNA TV title should be defended on both shows ad should be the highest ranking title for those who don't get PPV time.
those two guys right there, Booker T. and Rob Van Dam should be the gold standard for what a TV champion is. Oddly enough the six time WCW World television champion is the first Legends Champion and the longest reigning ECW World television champion is TNA's current top title holder. I think RVD as TVchamp did take on the ECW heavyweight champ a few times to.
TNA is in a hole but it only takes a bit of commonsense to get out of it and its alarming that they never use it.
What do you mean by "that other strap? When Steve Austin was television champ was it that other strap? When Steamboat held it was it that "other" title? Your starting to sound like Scott Hall..
Isn't the irony/learning lesson here the fact that TNA's current champion probably was never given ECW's heavyweight title over its television title because that fed's ECW champions needed a belt to bolster them and he didn't need the top strap? TNA needs more gold and traditional time rules for the title can also cut down on too much showtime being spent on it.
Te frequent name changes are making the title unstable.. It at first hated the TNA Global title but it grew on me. Sure it reeked of redundancy but at least it was strait to the point and took its branding literally, seriously, and to heart. The World title designation has gotten pretty out of context these last few years in wrestling.
I never understood why TNA's "global" title was anymore redundant then "intercontinental" or "international" which both correspond to a large geographical area. What's the difference?
An old fogees title? I thought the legends title was as stupid as the old Negro World title (Texas) or NWA World Midget's Championship.. How do you even set parameters? We know if your a over 220 lbs you can't get a cruiserweight title shot. We know if your a man you can't get a knockouts' title shot. What determines eligibility for the Legends championship?
They should have held a tourney for a new television title and kept the global title as it was.