A cure to HIV/AIDS?

Freddy4190

Championship Contender
Sorry if this is posted already: Got it off AOL News.

BANGKOK (Sept. 24) - For the first time, an experimental vaccine has prevented infection with the AIDS virus, a watershed event in the deadly epidemic and a surprising result. Recent failures led many scientists to think such a vaccine might never be possible.
The World Health Organization and the U.N. agency UNAIDS said the results "instilled new hope" in the field of HIV vaccine research, although researchers say it likely is many years before a vaccine might be available.

The vaccine — a combination of two previously unsuccessful vaccines — cut the risk of becoming infected with HIV by more than 31 percent in the world's largest AIDS vaccine trial of more than 16,000 volunteers in Thailand, researchers announced Thursday in Bangkok.
Even though the benefit is modest, "it's the first evidence that we could have a safe and effective preventive vaccine," Col. Jerome Kim told The Associated Press. He helped lead the study for the U.S. Army, which sponsored it with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
The institute's director, Dr. Anthony Fauci, warned that this is "not the end of the road," but he said he was surprised and very pleased by the outcome.
"It gives me cautious optimism about the possibility of improving this result" and developing a more effective AIDS vaccine, Fauci said. "This is something that we can do."
The Thailand Ministry of Public Health conducted the study. The U.S. Army has long worked with that government and others to develop and test vaccines and medicines to protect troops and the general public.
The study used strains of HIV common in Thailand. Whether such a vaccine would work against other strains in the U.S., Africa or elsewhere in the world is unknown, scientists stressed.
Even a marginally helpful vaccine could have a big impact. Every day, 7,500 people worldwide are newly infected with HIV; 2 million died of AIDS in 2007, UNAIDS estimates.
"Today marks a historic milestone," said Mitchell Warren, executive director of the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, an international group that has worked toward developing a vaccine. Warren was not involved in the study.
"It will take time and resources to fully analyze and understand the data, but there is little doubt that this finding will energize and redirect the AIDS vaccine field," he said in a statement.
The study tested the two-vaccine combination in a "prime-boost" approach, in which the first one primes the immune system to attack HIV and the second one strengthens the response.
They are ALVAC, from Sanofi Pasteur, the vaccine division of French drugmaker Sanofi-Aventis; and AIDSVAX, originally developed by VaxGen Inc. and now held by Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases, a nonprofit founded by some former VaxGen employees.
ALVAC uses canarypox, a bird virus altered so it can't cause human disease, to ferry synthetic versions of three HIV genes into the body. AIDSVAX contains a genetically engineered version of a protein on HIV's surface. The vaccines are not made from whole virus — dead or alive — and cannot cause HIV.
Neither vaccine in the study prevented HIV infection when tested individually in earlier trials, and dozens of scientists had called the new one futile when it began in 2003.
"I really didn't have high hopes at all that we would see a positive result," Fauci confessed.
The results proved the skeptics wrong.
"The combination is stronger than each of the individual members," said the Army's Kim, a physician who manages the Army's HIV vaccine program.
The study tested the combo in HIV-negative Thai men and women aged 18 to 30 at average risk of becoming infected. Half received four "priming" doses of ALVAC and two "boost" doses of AIDSVAX over six months. The others received dummy shots. No one knew who got what until the study ended.
Thanad Yomha, a 33-year-old electrician from southeastern Thailand, said he didn't expect anything in return for volunteering for the project.
"I did this for others," Thanad said. "It's for the next generation."
Participants volunteered for the study and were told about the potential risks associated with receiving the experimental vaccine before agreeing to participate.
All were given condoms, counseling and treatment for any sexually transmitted infections, and were tested every six months for HIV. Any who became infected were given free treatment with antiviral medicines. All participants continued to receive an HIV test every six months for three years after vaccinations ended.
The results: New infections occurred in 51 of the 8,197 given vaccine and in 74 of the 8,198 who received dummy shots. That worked out to a 31 percent lower risk of infection for the vaccine group. Two of the infected participants who received the placebo died.
The vaccine had no effect on levels of HIV in the blood for those who did become infected. That had been another goal of the study — seeing whether the vaccine could limit damage to the immune system and help keep infected people from developing full-blown AIDS.
That result is "one of the most important and intriguing findings of this trial," Fauci said. It suggests that the signs scientists have been using to gauge whether a vaccine was actually giving protection may not be valid.
"It is conceivable that we haven't even identified yet" what really shows immunity, which is both "important and humbling" after decades of vaccine research, Fauci said.
Details of the $105 million study will be given at a vaccine conference in Paris in October.
This is the third big vaccine trial since 1983, when HIV was identified as the cause of AIDS. In 2007, Merck & Co. stopped a study of its experimental vaccine after seeing it did not prevent HIV infection. Later analysis suggested the vaccine might even raise the risk of infection in certain men. The vaccine itself did not cause infection.
In 2003, AIDSVAX flunked two large trials — the first late-stage tests of any AIDS vaccine at the time.
It is unclear whether vaccine makers will seek to license the two-vaccine combo in Thailand. Before the trial began, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said other studies would be needed before the vaccine could be considered for U.S. licensing.
"This is a world first which proves that vaccine development is possible," Supachai said. "But this is not to the level where we can license or manufacture the vaccine yet."
Mass-producing the vaccine, plus how to proceed with future studies, will be discussed among the governments, study sponsors and companies involved in the trial, Kim said. Scientists want to know how long protection will last, whether booster shots will be needed, and whether the vaccine helps prevent infection in gay men and injection drug users, since it was tested mostly in heterosexuals in the Thai trial.
The study was done in Thailand because U.S. Army scientists did pivotal research in that country when the AIDS epidemic emerged there, isolating virus strains and providing genetic information on them to vaccine makers. The Thai government also strongly supported the idea of doing the study.

Personally, I think this is all great. It sounds amazing, I'm hoping everything works out. Opinions on this? Do you think it'll actually help with the prevention or treatment of AIDS/HIV? I may have missed a few points, I kind of skimmed through the article. Discuss.
 
1) I sooo posted a post in the Bar Room about this, but didn't get around to make the thread just yet. Damn it I'm lazy.

This is exactly the kind of stuff I'm going to be doing when I get my feet on the ground after college. Biomedical Engineers live to make everyone's life longer and easier with respect to fighting diseases and other ailments. The fact that I don't have to worry about AIDS quite as much because these researchers are more than on their way to figuring it out makes me a happy little camper inside.

I don't see how anyone could see this as a negative, or that it won't actually end up helping prevent AIDS/HIV. For one, the treatment of HIV/AIDS has gotten to the point where death of a person with AIDS in an industrialized country (due to the AIDS alone, of course) shouldn't happen. Anti-virals and other "drug cocktails" and the way they are administered has really taken a step forward through the years. Now just to make those drugs affordable for the millions upon millions in Africa.

The fact that the vaccine didn't increase resistance to the disease by any more than 30 some odd percent may seem small and shitty, but anyone who thinks that doesn't understand. There has never been an AIDS vaccine that actually works. Hell, earlier attempts showed evidence that the vaccines might have increased risk. 30 percent is fucking huge for a vaccine that is the first to show any sort of promise. Also, once we can get vaccines that work on a more consistent basis we'll actually have something to pump our AIDS money into. Sexual education and treatment is all good, but when you can make a vaccine? Fuck yeah.

I may seem overly excited or nerding out on this one, but there is good reason. This is what I'm going to do with my life. This is what I live for. This has seriously made my October. Fuck you Organic Chemistry. My fellow Biomedical Engineers have almost found a vaccine for motherfucking AIDS.
 
I know this sounds terrible and I hope that people take this as I intended it, but curing the disease in a third world country really is short term thinking on the issue of helping the general population of the world.

Research has shown (although this number is debated some) that the earth can sustain between 7 and 13 billion people. At the moment it has been shown that the earth is populating at the rate of about a billion person increase every 100 years. So by the calculation I found on the statistics bureau (I can't remember the link, I did an assignment like this for biology) we have between 100-400 years until this world can no longer sustain its own population.

Also taking into account that people in established countries are taking about 4-12 people recourses each; the world is screwed.

Like it or not, disease was natures way of reaching an equilibrium on things like this. Humans keep on curing disease to make life longer and easier and we are putting a greater and greater strain on the environment.

People NEED to die for the greater population to live. I know it is a terrible thing to say and curing AIDS and Cancer etc. sounds like a wonderful thing to do but your grandchildren and their grandchildren are going to suffer. We keep thinking about today without thought for tomorrow.

Please don't take this as some evil statement because as I have said I know how terrible this sounds but I am thinking about the long term good for the whole world!

Just My Opinion
 
There a few truths in this world, beyond speculation. You can talk all of the urban myths you want to... whether or not Bigfoot is real... Man landed on the Moon or not... or if the Illuminati controls everything. Hell, we could sit here all day pondering if OJ really did it or not. The one thing I will never speculate on, and I don't care if you agree with me or not... this is not a debate, it's a fact... there's been a cure for AIDS for the past 12-13 years now. The only reason that it's being publicized now, is because the elitists of the world now have it, and an excuse needs to be made as to why they're getting cured. That cat is officially out of the bag, gentlemen...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,848
Messages
3,300,881
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top