I think I just saw a tumbleweed roll by....
The Newswire (which was once known as the cigar lounge) used to be a hotbed of debate that had constant activity. I used to come to this site for the sole purpose of checking out this forum. The only intelligent back and forth I've ever seen on the internet was usually here. I remember a great debate/conversation I once had with someone on the existence of God. No name calling, no personal attacks, just a real engagement of the ideas.
Now, hardly anyone seems to be around and I don't even recognize the names of people who have the few postings remaining. And all this during an election year?
Granted, I'm just as at fault for this as anyone else (though it's because I've been working on the CPA, graduating college, and started working), but maybe this post will change some of that, even if it's just for this thread.
......
Now the title comes from a relatively well-known video on Youtube called "10 questions that every intelligent Christian must answer."
Often times during debates on abortion, the question is posed to those who are prolife on where their limits are (rape, incest, health/life of the mother) and it's the ones who are prolife who must defend their beliefs as not extreme, yet those who are prochoice are never asked to hold their views to simmilar tests. They just say they are for a woman's right to chose and their views are examined no farther.
After coming across this article on a Christian website about questions prochoice candidates should have to answer, I thought, why not pose these questions here? So here you go...
Article - http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs...choice-candidate-is-never-asked-by-the-media/
I feel that these are respectful people who are prochoice should be considerate about.
Feel free to answer or comment on any and all of the above or any other things that are relevant, no matter your stance on the issue.
Sidenote - apparently the signature I was using was too big, even though I've seen plenty of other posts with larger graphics. Oh well, it was an Alberto Del Rio picture, and since he's been such a disappointment, I have no problem taking it down.
The Newswire (which was once known as the cigar lounge) used to be a hotbed of debate that had constant activity. I used to come to this site for the sole purpose of checking out this forum. The only intelligent back and forth I've ever seen on the internet was usually here. I remember a great debate/conversation I once had with someone on the existence of God. No name calling, no personal attacks, just a real engagement of the ideas.
Now, hardly anyone seems to be around and I don't even recognize the names of people who have the few postings remaining. And all this during an election year?
Granted, I'm just as at fault for this as anyone else (though it's because I've been working on the CPA, graduating college, and started working), but maybe this post will change some of that, even if it's just for this thread.
......
Now the title comes from a relatively well-known video on Youtube called "10 questions that every intelligent Christian must answer."
Often times during debates on abortion, the question is posed to those who are prolife on where their limits are (rape, incest, health/life of the mother) and it's the ones who are prolife who must defend their beliefs as not extreme, yet those who are prochoice are never asked to hold their views to simmilar tests. They just say they are for a woman's right to chose and their views are examined no farther.
After coming across this article on a Christian website about questions prochoice candidates should have to answer, I thought, why not pose these questions here? So here you go...
Article - http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs...choice-candidate-is-never-asked-by-the-media/
1) You say you support a womans right to make her own reproductive choices in regards to abortion and contraception. Are there any restrictions you would approve of?
2) In 2010, The Economist featured a cover story on the war on girls and the growth of gendercide in the world abortion based solely on the sex of the baby. Does this phenomenon pose a problem for you or do you believe in the absolute right of a woman to terminate a pregnancy because the unborn fetus is female?
3) In many states, a teenager can have an abortion without her parents consent or knowledge but cannot get an aspirin from the school nurse without parental authorization. Do you support any restrictions or parental notification regarding abortion access for minors?
4) If you do not believe that human life begins at conception, when do you believe it begins? At what stage of development should an unborn child have human rights?
5) Currently, when genetic testing reveals an unborn child has Down Syndrome, most women choose to abort. How do you answer the charge that this phenomenon resembles the eugenics movement a century ago the slow, but deliberate weeding out of those our society would deem unfit to live?
6) Do you believe an employer should be forced to violate his or her religious conscience by providing access to abortifacient drugs and contraception to employees?
7) Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King, Jr. has said that abortion is the white supremacists best friend, pointing to the fact that Black and Latinos represent 25% of our population but account for 59% of all abortions. How do you respond to the charge that the majority of abortion clinics are found in inner-city areas with large numbers of minorities?
8) You describe abortion as a tragic choice. If abortion is not morally objectionable, then why is it tragic? Does this mean there is something about abortion that is different than other standard surgical procedures?
9) Do you believe abortion should be legal once the unborn fetus is viable able to survive outside the womb?
10) If a pregnant woman and her unborn child are murdered, do you believe the criminal should face two counts of murder and serve a harsher sentence?
I feel that these are respectful people who are prochoice should be considerate about.
Feel free to answer or comment on any and all of the above or any other things that are relevant, no matter your stance on the issue.
Sidenote - apparently the signature I was using was too big, even though I've seen plenty of other posts with larger graphics. Oh well, it was an Alberto Del Rio picture, and since he's been such a disappointment, I have no problem taking it down.