Recent content by ECWDanSelby

Which begs the question: Why do we always have MMA news on Wrestling sites?! ALWAYS baffled me, that one. Selby

The way I see it is this: If you're starting a topic off with 'wat', to me, that shows you cannot be bothered to use punctuation or a spell checker. So why should we bother reading it and giving feedback? Which is kind of silly given what i'm doing now, but hey ho :) Selby

First, you havn't used punctuation correctly. Secondly, you need to look at your grammar. Thirdly, if I wanted to watch MMA, i'd watch MMA. I don't, so I won't, which means i'm really not keen on the idea. Sorry. Selby

I think being the cocky but funny heel is always much, much easier to pull off than as a face, therefore i'd go with heel. There's something rebellious in us that likes these smart-arse/humorous heels. And these promos that make us s****** often get modified when they turn face, to try and...

Ah, my apologies. I think I mis-read. If this stable was to be bought in to WWE..? Hmm. I can't see really Vince giving TNA that 'spotlight' (indirectly, I know). WCW were genuine competition, and TNA arn't. I guess that's the big difference there. 85% of fans just will not know who these guys...

I actually think the Outlaws would be a tremendous addition to the WWE Tag Team scene. Hear me out... They're looking to rebuild, and rebuilding takes a while. Sticking a pair like The Outlaws back in instantly gives the scene some credibility (EVEN if you don't know these guys) because...

Dude, you're getting some serious rep. You literally said everything I wanted to say perfectly, so thanks for saving me the time. Spot on. Selby

I don't mean to sound like a negative nitpick here, but do you have any evidence for that? That's the first i've heard of it. If so, it'd be such a wise purchase for WWE. Trouble is, they wouldn't be Beer Money. They'd probably give them a nice 'real life' name like Brandon Tyson and Steve...

I'm not so sure this is necessary/would work. The Radicalz is one of those factions that's looked at through rose-tinted glasses. There wasn't a great deal of character/charisma there. They really wasn't much in terms of storyline with the stable as a whole. What i'm saying is, they were a...

Fair play to the OP here. For the first time, last night, I kind of had the same feeling. It was during the Triple H promo where any time he mentioned Cena, he was just getting boo's, whereas Punk was getting good reactions. Now don't jump all over me here, because I know full well...

I think you guys need to realise that it may have actually been down to the guy taking the TKO as to why it may have looked botchy. I've taken the move a few times, and it's really up to you as to how you land. You either flat front bump it (correct way), or you can bottle it a little and land...

What?! How can you say 'how is he bland? he has a sick finisher'. That's like saying "I hate beer! But I love eating pies". They're completely unrelated. Kaz needed Fourtune to get big, and they didn't. Instead they were too busy watering it down with Chris Daniels and focusing more on...

Thing is, we talk about an ex-WWE/WCW guy needing to be champ to lead the company and draw, but look at the ratings. Are they that higher now they have Anderson/Hogan etc than they were a couple of years back? Selby

Coming from someone who started watching mid/late 2008, I can tell you there was much, much more wrestling AND better quality matches before 2010. And i'm not doing this a pointless knock or wearing the rose-tints. Impact is so bogged down in its own sh!t now that it's just incredibly...

This is a great idea, and very, very logical. It's much better to have some lower carders jobbing to trademarks as oppose to Kurt Angle PPV syndrome, where we have multiple kickouts from finishers every fricken PPV. Selby