So you're insulting the intelligence of anyone who disagrees just because you feel your opinions are superior? Now now, that was uncalled for.
Well, no. I think he's commenting on your condescending attitude.
Pretty much your only logic is this; we should reward wrestlers for not o/ding on pain killers by allowing them to smoke marijuana, right?
Or, maybe he's trying to justify giving them another out, instead of putting opiates one step short of heroin into their body. These guys OD because those pills take a while to act, so they keep sucking them down until they feel better. Often times, these guys are ten deep by the time they feel anything. Marijuana acts instantly, and is the world's best pain killer.
Or better yet, you're saying just because there are worse things out there justifies the use of marijuana, correct?
It does. See above. There is a reason so many states have legalized it for pain. Cancer patients are able to eat after chemo because of it. It has extended their lives. Maybe these guys should go to Chris Benoit's doctor instead. Just because something is legal does not mean it's good for you. It means that it provides an avenue for tax revenue.
After you insulted the intelligence of those who are against it, I'm kind of shocked by the reasons you provided. I'd at least expect something, well.... better rather than saying two wrongs equals a right.
For two wrongs to equal a right, you would have to combine them. There is only a one wrong in play here, because you say it's wrong. This is the condescending attitude I was talking about earlier.
Yeah life on the road is tough but hey, if you can't handle it then that lifestyle is not for you and you should be looking into a different profession rather than using something illegal to adjust yourself to a lifestyle that is not suited for you.
Right. So they should keep using the pills that have been killing their friends instead.
But to be fair from a business perspective rather than only providing my opinions, seeing weed is illegal and a lot of dealers really do not have a good reputation in general, why would you want someone to work for you who is in the other side of the law?
This is a good point. We don't need to debate legalization. I'll crush you on that, but it does seem like a good idea. Especially when you consider that more and more states are legalizing it for medical use, it seems that law is coming around.
And no telling what kind of people they are associated with. Yeah alcohol is worse but I think companies would rather have their workers do what is legal rather than being in the other side of the law.
True. But, then again, these guys drink all night and then get on the road to get to the next city. This is a problem too. So, you can keep trying to justify the use of alcohol, but as you asked, do two wrongs make a right?
Whether or not you agree with it, that is life for you. When you're working for a big company they look for people with class; people they'd be proud to have represent their company and what they're about.
Are you really proselytizing? Classless? Do you understand how many "classy" people smoke? Pot isn't exactly the underground drug you seem to make it out to be. Major broadcast media almost glorifies it at this point. This, once again, is the condescending attitude I was talking about.